2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0304-3959(03)00278-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical treatment of chronic low back pain with a capsicum plaster

Abstract: The efficacy and tolerance of a capsicum plaster in non-specific low back pain was investigated in a double-blind, randomised, placebo-controlled multicentre parallel group study. A total of 320 patients were randomly assigned to two groups of n=160 subjects treated by the active or the placebo plaster. The main outcome measures used were a compound pain subscore of the Arhus low back rating scale (continuous variable), and a response criterion of a reduction in pain subscore=30% from baseline to final assessm… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
49
0
4

Year Published

2006
2006
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(57 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
4
49
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were similar to those obtained with a similar capsaicin 8% patch in a similarly designed trial (Keitel et al, 2001). The most common adverse events were application site warmth or itching, although inflammatory contact eczema, urticaria, small hemorrhagic spots, vesiculation, and dermatitis have been reported in a small number of patients (Frerick et al, 2003;Keitel et al, 2001). Given modest efficacy and generally good tolerability, the capsaicin 8% patch may only be useful as adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in a small subgroup of patients.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These results were similar to those obtained with a similar capsaicin 8% patch in a similarly designed trial (Keitel et al, 2001). The most common adverse events were application site warmth or itching, although inflammatory contact eczema, urticaria, small hemorrhagic spots, vesiculation, and dermatitis have been reported in a small number of patients (Frerick et al, 2003;Keitel et al, 2001). Given modest efficacy and generally good tolerability, the capsaicin 8% patch may only be useful as adjunctive therapy or as monotherapy in a small subgroup of patients.…”
supporting
confidence: 81%
“…In a double-blind, randomized trial, 320 patients with chronic low back pain were assigned to apply the capsaicin 8% patch or placebo patch once daily for 3 weeks (Frerick et al, 2003). …”
Section: The Capsaicin 8% Patchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…individuals in whom pain was reduced by at least 30% of the baseline value) was also significantly higher for the capsicum group (60.8% vs 42.1% in the placebo group; p = 0.0219). A second study from the same group of authors, which involved 320 patients with chronic, nonspecific back pain who were randomly assigned to capsicum plaster (N=160) or placebo plaster (N=160), produced similar results: after three weeks treatment, the compound pain sub-score was reduced by 42% and 31% (p=0.002) for capsicum and placebo plasters respectively, and responder rate was 67% versus 49% (p=0.002) respectively (Frerick et al 2003). The authors claimed that the superiority of the capsicum plaster was highly statistically significant and clinically relevant.…”
Section: Effectivenessmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…In situ conservation is formally defined by FAO [9] as "the conservation of ecosystems and natural habitats and the maintenance and recovery of viable populations of species in their natural surroundings and, in the case of domesticated or cultivated species, in the surroundings where they have developed their distinctive properties." Native chili varieties are rich in health-related compounds, such as vitamins and antioxidants [10] and capsaicin, a component used for medicinal applications [11,12]. The great variation in the genetic resources of native chilies has yet to be fully taken advantage of by society [13,14].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%