Proceedings of the 15th International Conference on World Wide Web 2006
DOI: 10.1145/1135777.1135792
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical TrustRank

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0
2

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
4
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Several results has appeared that apply rank propagation to extend initial trust or distrust judgments over a small set of seed pages or sites to the entire web, such as trust [53,103], distrust [81,32] propagation in the neighborhood or their combination [102] as well as graph based similarity measures [9]. These methods are either based on propagating trust forward or distrust backwards along the hyperlinks based on the idea that honest pages predominantly point to honest ones, or, stated the other way, spam pages are pointed by spam pages.…”
Section: Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several results has appeared that apply rank propagation to extend initial trust or distrust judgments over a small set of seed pages or sites to the entire web, such as trust [53,103], distrust [81,32] propagation in the neighborhood or their combination [102] as well as graph based similarity measures [9]. These methods are either based on propagating trust forward or distrust backwards along the hyperlinks based on the idea that honest pages predominantly point to honest ones, or, stated the other way, spam pages are pointed by spam pages.…”
Section: Related Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Then, Wu et al 16 introduced the cheating methods of hidden content and redirection to supplement the new cheating methods. Because TrustRank selects a seed set that does not necessarily effectively represent different topics on the Web, and TrustRank tends to favor larger communities, Wu et al 17 proposed topic‐based TrustRank in 2006, which divides the seed set by topic information, calculates trust scores for each topic, reduces the rank of web spam by spreading trust and nontrust scores simultaneously, 18 and cheats links by random walk 19I n. 2009, Zhang et al 20 used bidirectional links to pass AVRank and HVRank ratings, and achieved better results than TrustRank in identifying high‐quality webpages.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In [19], Wu et al propose an approach based on trust and distrust propagation. This work consists in an algorithm that computes two scores for each node in the graph, indicating the levels of trust and distrust of a page.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%