2015
DOI: 10.5812/aapm.23501v2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topical Versus Intravenous Lidocaine in Children With Upper Respiratory Infection Undergoing Anesthesia: A Randomized, Double Blind, Clinical Trial

Abstract: Background:The current randomized double-blind clinical trial aimed to compare the incidence of post-operative cough with intravenous vs. topical lidocaine in children with mild upper respiratory infection (URI) anesthetized with laryngeal mask airway (LMA) in the university-affiliated medical center.Objectives:To assess the incidence of adverse respiratory event including cough, apnea, laryngospasm, bronchospasm following two different methods of lidocaine administration in anesthetized children with mild URI… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The inclusion criteria for pediatric patients were as follows: (1) age range of 1 - 6 years; (2) parents’ recognition of mild URI symptoms (eg, cough, sneeze, and nasal discharge or congestion), initiated within the past 2 weeks; (3) no evidence of the symptoms of bacterial (eg, ill appearance evaluated by the anesthesiologist, axillary temperature > 38°C, and purulent discharge or sputum) or lower respiratory tract infection (eg, crackles or wheezing sounds); and (4) any other medical condition (eg, respiratory conditions, cardiac diseases, allergies, conditions resulting in difficult airway management, and neurological disorders). All the patients had to be anesthetized for the ophthalmologic examination in a short period of time (less than 6 weeks) to prevent any deleterious outcomes ( 6 , 7 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…The inclusion criteria for pediatric patients were as follows: (1) age range of 1 - 6 years; (2) parents’ recognition of mild URI symptoms (eg, cough, sneeze, and nasal discharge or congestion), initiated within the past 2 weeks; (3) no evidence of the symptoms of bacterial (eg, ill appearance evaluated by the anesthesiologist, axillary temperature > 38°C, and purulent discharge or sputum) or lower respiratory tract infection (eg, crackles or wheezing sounds); and (4) any other medical condition (eg, respiratory conditions, cardiac diseases, allergies, conditions resulting in difficult airway management, and neurological disorders). All the patients had to be anesthetized for the ophthalmologic examination in a short period of time (less than 6 weeks) to prevent any deleterious outcomes ( 6 , 7 ).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…URI was diagnosed based on a positive history of nasal congestion or discharge, initiated 2 weeks prior to surgery, as mentioned by the parents or guardians ( 6 , 7 ). On the day of surgery, preanesthesia symptoms of common cold (eg, runny nose, nasal congestion, cough, sputum, and sneeze) were evaluated by an anesthesiologist (appendix 1 in the supplementary file) ( 6 , 7 ). Patients who scored above 2 on any of the items in the questionnaire were considered to have moderate to severe URI and were not enrolled in the study.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations