1993
DOI: 10.1109/36.210464
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographic mapping using radar interferometry: processing techniques

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
136
0
6

Year Published

1999
1999
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 267 publications
(142 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
0
136
0
6
Order By: Relevance
“…Scattering phase centre height was estimated from the interferograms following eq. 3 by Madsen et al (1993).…”
Section: Digital Surface Model (Dsm) Generation 31 Insar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Scattering phase centre height was estimated from the interferograms following eq. 3 by Madsen et al (1993).…”
Section: Digital Surface Model (Dsm) Generation 31 Insar Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The images are properly registered, with a sub-pixel accuracy, and preprocessed to remove flat Earth interferometric phase [35] and to depurate the focused images from the atmospheric and nonlinear deformation contributions on a small scale (low resolution) [31]. Then, in any range-azimuth pixel, the m-th acquired image u m is given by the superposition of the signal backscattered by the targets located at the given azimuth and range coordinates, and at different elevation s. Then, the image signal, in the case of slow moving scatterers, can be expressed by [31] …”
Section: Tomographic Signal and 5d Scatterer Detectionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The main error sources of the navigation system that cause a height degradation in the final terrain model are the absolute height and the absolute roll angle errors [17]:…”
Section: Navigation System-induced Phase Errorsmentioning
confidence: 99%