“…According to Jackson et al (2006), the complexity of sample preparation and instrumental techniques, the expense of instrument, and the number of analyte ions that can be determined are the important criteria for selecting a surface analytical technique. Based on literatures reported previously, besides the abovementioned fluorescence microscopic techniques, proton-induced X-ray emission (PIXE) (Thong et al, 1999;Robertson et al, 2002;Augustyniak et al, 2006;Reinert et al, 2007), microprobe synchrotron X-ray fluorescence (ASXRF) (Ide-Ektessabi, Kawakami, & Watt, 2004;Flinn et al, 2005;Serpa et al, 2008), synchrotron X-ray absorption spectroscopy (SXAS) (Collingwood et al, 2005;Mikhaylova et al, 2005), secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS) (Burns, 1981;Clerc, Fourre, & Fragu, 1997;Aranyosiova et al, 2008), and laser ablation inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (LA-ICP-MS) (Feldmann, Kindness, & Ek, 2002;Becker et al, 2005aBecker et al, ,b, 2007aBecker et al, ,b, 2008aJackson et al, 2006;Dobrowolska et al, 2008;Sela et al, 2007;Zoriy et al, 2008) are the most widely applied surface analytical techniques for elemental imaging in brain tissues.…”