2009
DOI: 10.1093/cercor/bhp119
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topographical Functional Connectivity Pattern in the Perisylvian Language Networks

Abstract: We performed a resting-state functional connectivity study to investigate directly the functional correlations within the perisylvian language networks by seeding from 3 subregions of Broca's complex (pars opercularis, pars triangularis, and pars orbitalis) and their right hemisphere homologues. A clear topographical functional connectivity pattern in the left middle frontal, parietal, and temporal areas was revealed for the 3 left seeds. This is the first demonstration that a functional connectivity topology … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

34
166
2
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 190 publications
(203 citation statements)
references
References 84 publications
34
166
2
1
Order By: Relevance
“…The other region activated in the READ task was the left inferior parietal lobe (IPL), a region that is often associated with semantic or phonological working memory (Gold et al, 2005), as well as general working memory load (Owen et al, 2005). Connectivity analysis revealed close coupling between the LIFG and IPL as well as between the IPL and the temporal cortex (Catani et al, 2005;Xiang et al, 2010). These results suggest that the posterior activation may be task-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…The other region activated in the READ task was the left inferior parietal lobe (IPL), a region that is often associated with semantic or phonological working memory (Gold et al, 2005), as well as general working memory load (Owen et al, 2005). Connectivity analysis revealed close coupling between the LIFG and IPL as well as between the IPL and the temporal cortex (Catani et al, 2005;Xiang et al, 2010). These results suggest that the posterior activation may be task-dependent.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This is in keeping with left hemisphere predominance of other aspects of phonological processing at the network level (Glasser and Rilling 2008; Price 2010; Xiang et al. 2010). …”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This allows in vivo analysis of the anatomical connectivity of different regions, and how they vary between species (e.g., Rilling et al, 2008). Such analyses are complemented by functional connectivity analysis (which uses cross-correlation in time across multiple brain areas) to evaluate which regions are coactivated in particular tasks (Sporns et al, 2004;Xiang et al, 2010;Hamilton et al, 2013), an approach also potentially applicable to interspecies comparisons (Rilling et al, 2007). Such approaches have led to important advances in our understanding of the neural computations that underlie language, including the still ongoing debate about whether any are specific to language or not (cf.…”
Section: Neuroscientific Datamentioning
confidence: 99%