2013
DOI: 10.1080/00221686.2013.796574
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topography discretization techniques for Godunov-type shallow water numerical models: a comparative study

Abstract: This paper compares various topography discretization approaches for Godunov-type shallow water numerical models. Many different approaches have emerged popular with Godunov-type water wave models. To date, literature lacks an investigative study distinguishing their pros and the cons, and assessing their reliability relating to issues of practical interest. To address this gap, this work reviews and assesses five standard topography discretization methods that consist of the Upwind, the surface gradient metho… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
22
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…(35) is a central difference approximation, and the second term acts as a diffusion term to stabilize the scheme [14], and in viewing that the standard HLL flux defined by Eq. (35) actually predicts promising results in unsteady flow conditions under all flow regimes [27,36,37], it is reasonable to assume that Eq. (35) may be inaccurate solely for flow with weak motions, in which case the diffusion term can be omitted to maintain the stationary flow at rest.…”
Section: Additional Issue Related To Maintain Steady Stationary Flow mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(35) is a central difference approximation, and the second term acts as a diffusion term to stabilize the scheme [14], and in viewing that the standard HLL flux defined by Eq. (35) actually predicts promising results in unsteady flow conditions under all flow regimes [27,36,37], it is reasonable to assume that Eq. (35) may be inaccurate solely for flow with weak motions, in which case the diffusion term can be omitted to maintain the stationary flow at rest.…”
Section: Additional Issue Related To Maintain Steady Stationary Flow mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…2 The nonlinearity parameter is another related identifier, which is defined as the ratio of the wave amplitude scale to the water depth scale, = a/h 0 . [9][10][11] DG methods are becoming increasingly popular in solving BT equations. Removing this assumption (ie, let = O(1)) while keeping all the O( ) terms gives the so-called Green-Naghdi (GN) equations.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The interface between a wet and a dry cell is usually referred to as the wet/dry front or wet/dry interface [12,13]. Especially wet/dry interfaces over complex topography are known to cause numerical errors such as spurious oscillations in the flow velocity and negative water depths [13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%