“…The relative ratio of L to M cones among individuals with normal color vision is highly variable. The first direct evidence for the relative distribution of L versus M cones came from adaptive optics and retinal densitometry (Hofer et al, 2005, Roorda & Williams, 1999), and the results confirm reports of variation in the L:M ratio among humans with normal color vision from studies that use indirect methods (Rushton & Baker, 1964, Carroll, Neitz, & Neitz, 2002, Kuchenbecker, Sahay, Tait, Neitz & Neitz, 2008, Mollon & Bowmaker, 1992, Neitz et al, 2006,). In summary, the development of S cones and their arrangement in the adult retina compared to L and M cones all point to the identity of S cones as being distinctly different from L and M cones, with S cones being non-randomly distributed.…”