2002
DOI: 10.1143/jjap.41.3947
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topography Simulation of Reactive Ion Etching Combined with Plasma Simulation, Sheath Model, and Surface Reaction Model

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
10
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As can be seen in Fig. 2,11 Higher RIE power also decreases the deviation of the distribution of ion incident angles, 14 leading to less ion bombardment of the sidewalls and thus improved anisotropy. Another key process parameter is the RIE power.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…As can be seen in Fig. 2,11 Higher RIE power also decreases the deviation of the distribution of ion incident angles, 14 leading to less ion bombardment of the sidewalls and thus improved anisotropy. Another key process parameter is the RIE power.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 84%
“…5,6 The fluxes of ions and radicals are calculated from the products of the densities and the velocities at which they collide on the wafer. 5 and 6.…”
Section: A Rie Simulation Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been found that the micro-or nanoscale may affect the macroscale. [20,21] Concerning the multiscale modeling of plasma etching processes, there are studies [22][23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34] linking the reactor with the predefined feature scale. Even if there are separate studies and models for the reactor scale [35][36][37][38][39][40] and for the roughening of substrates with no predefined features, [41][42][43][44] there is no study or framework for the linking or coupling of the reactor scale with the micro-or nanoscale roughness of the etched substrate.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%