2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.ecocom.2009.06.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological change of Andean plant–pollinator networks along an altitudinal gradient

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

10
69
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
10
69
1
Order By: Relevance
“…For example, Olesen and Jordano (2002) found that plant-pollinator networks in lowlands and at high latitudes show high connectance (i.e., a high fraction of potential interactions actually realized in the field). Likewise, Ramos-Jiliberto et al (2010) found that nestedness (i.e., the tendency for a network to show little reciprocal specialization) systematically decrease in pollination networks at higher altitudes, while Albrecht et al (2010) found higher nestedness in glacier forelands than in late successional communities.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…For example, Olesen and Jordano (2002) found that plant-pollinator networks in lowlands and at high latitudes show high connectance (i.e., a high fraction of potential interactions actually realized in the field). Likewise, Ramos-Jiliberto et al (2010) found that nestedness (i.e., the tendency for a network to show little reciprocal specialization) systematically decrease in pollination networks at higher altitudes, while Albrecht et al (2010) found higher nestedness in glacier forelands than in late successional communities.…”
Section: Electronic Supplementary Materialsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Our results are similar to those found for binary plant–pollinator networks along a single elevational gradient in the Chilean Andes, where fewer interactions per species were observed with increasing elevation (Ramos‐Jiliberto et al . ), suggesting that environmental filtering at high elevations may act upon both mutualistic and antagonistic networks.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Networks of mutualistic plant–pollinator interactions have been examined along elevational gradients (Devoto, Medan & Montaldo ; Ramos‐Jiliberto et al . ; Benadi et al . ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is actually consistent with physiology‐based theories, such as those proposed to explain Bergmann's rule (Classen et al, ). Still, the association between body size and resource use, dispersal capacity and pollination efficiency (Chown & Gaston, ) might also explain the positive relationship between elevation and insect body size at the community scale, especially when trophic resources decrease with elevation (Miller‐Struttmann & Galen, ; Ramos‐Jiliberto et al, ). Pollinator body‐size is highly positively correlated with foraging distance and proboscis length in many taxa (Agosta & Janzen, ; Byrne, Buchmann, & Spangler, ; Casey, May, & Morgan, ; Greenleaf, Williams, Winfree, & Kremen, ; Levy & Nufio, ).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%