2015
DOI: 10.1090/tran6685
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological dynamics of automorphism groups, ultrafilter combinatorics, and the Generic Point Problem

Abstract: For G a closed subgroup of S ∞ , we provide a precise combinatorial characterization of when the universal minimal flow M (G) is metrizable. In particular, each such instance fits into the framework of metrizable flows developed in [KPT] and [NVT]; as a consequence, each G with metrizable universal minimal flow has the generic point property, i.e. every minimal G-flow has a point whose orbit is comeager. This solves the Generic Point Problem raised in [AKL] for closed subgroups of S ∞ . space of structures of … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
79
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 36 publications
(81 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
2
79
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In fact, the converse is also true: if M(G) is metrisable, then there is a comeagre G‐orbit on M(G) and the stabiliser of a point in this orbit is extremely amenable and co‐precompact in G. This is proved by Zucker in and, independently, by Ben Yaacov, Melleray and Tsankov in . (The latter builds on work in and proves the result for arbitrary Polish groups G.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…In fact, the converse is also true: if M(G) is metrisable, then there is a comeagre G‐orbit on M(G) and the stabiliser of a point in this orbit is extremely amenable and co‐precompact in G. This is proved by Zucker in and, independently, by Ben Yaacov, Melleray and Tsankov in . (The latter builds on work in and proves the result for arbitrary Polish groups G.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Remarks (1)By the above result and [, Theorem 1.2], we know that some structure in (scriptC0;s) has infinite Ramsey degree (as defined in Section 2.2). In fact, the argument in the proof of part (1) above shows that, in the notation used there, A has infinite Ramsey degree in (scriptC0;s).…”
Section: K‐sparse Graphs and Their Orientationsmentioning
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations