2013
DOI: 10.1007/s11856-013-0057-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological freeness for Hilbert bimodules

Abstract: Abstract. It is shown that topological freeness of Rieffel's induced representation functor implies that any C * -algebra generated by a faithful covariant representation of a Hilbert bimodule X over a C * -algebra A is canonically isomorphic to the crossed product A ⋊ X Z. An ideal lattice description and a simplicity criterion for A ⋊ X Z are established. IntroductionThe topological freeness is a condition expressed in terms of the dual system allowing to relate the ideal structure of the crossed product to … Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
0
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Archbold and Spielberg discussed in [8] the relation between the ideal structure of the full crossed product and that of the base algebra, under the assumption of topological freeness. More recently, the definition of topological freeness and several related results were extended to different settings: by Exel, Laca and Quigg for partial actions on commutative C * -algebras in [12], by Lebedev in [17], and later by Giordano and Sierakowski in [14], for partial actions on arbitrary C * -algebras, and by Kwaśniewski in [16]) for crossed products by Hilbert C * -bimodules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Archbold and Spielberg discussed in [8] the relation between the ideal structure of the full crossed product and that of the base algebra, under the assumption of topological freeness. More recently, the definition of topological freeness and several related results were extended to different settings: by Exel, Laca and Quigg for partial actions on commutative C * -algebras in [12], by Lebedev in [17], and later by Giordano and Sierakowski in [14], for partial actions on arbitrary C * -algebras, and by Kwaśniewski in [16]) for crossed products by Hilbert C * -bimodules.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…After establishing some background and notation in Section 1, we introduce in Section 2 a partial actionα on the spectrum of the unit fiber of a Fell bundle B over a discrete group. When B is the Fell bundle corresponding to a partial action γ, thenα agrees withγ, as defined in [5,Section 7] or [17], and when B is the Fell bundle associated in [2] with the crossed-product by a Hilbert C * -bimodule, thenα is the homeomorphismĥ discussed in [16]. Following familiar lines, we establish in Section 3 a bijective correspondence between the family ofα-invariant open sets in the spectrum of the unit fiber and the set of ideals in B (Proposition 3.8 and Proposition 3.10) This enables us to show that, whenα is topologically free, its minimality is equivalent to the simplicity of C * r (B) (Corollary 3.12).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For reversible and extendible systems the relevant statements in [33,Subsection 4.5] were deduced from [34, Theorem 2.20]. We will extend them by applying general results from [32] and facts presented in Appendix A.…”
Section: 7mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…where α´1 x is the inverse to the isomorphism α x : pker α x q K Ñ α x p1 ϕpxq qApxqα x p1 ϕpxq q. The maps α˚, x have strictly continuous extensions which are given by (32) with α´1 x replaced by the inverse to the strictly continuous isomorphism α x : Mppker α x q K q Ñ α x p1 ϕpxq qMpApxqqα x p1 ϕpxq q, cf. Lemma 3.12.…”
Section: Example 38 (Endomorphisms Of C˚-algebras With Hausdorff Primentioning
confidence: 99%