2019
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.1912.07877
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological magnons in ferromagnetic Kitaev-Heisenberg model on CaVO lattice

Moumita Deb,
Asim Kumar Ghosh

Abstract: A number of first order topological phases are found to emerge in the ferromagnetic Kitaev-Heisenberg model on square-octagon lattice in the presence of Dzyaloshinskii-Moriya interaction. Heisenberg and Kitaev terms have been considered on nearest and next-nearest neighbor bonds in a variety of ways. Both isotropic and anisotropic couplings are taken into account. Topological phases are characterized by Chern numbers for the distinct magnon bands as well as the number of modes for topologically protected gaple… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This difference attributes to the fact that AFM ground state breaks the full symmetry of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian, while the singlet ground states in this study do not. Emergence of multiple topological phases in irradiated tightbinding and FM Kitaev-Heisenberg models on this lattice is noted before 25,26 . The effect of DMI cannot be registered either in POT or BOT because of the fact that, n (S n × S n+1 ) z vanishes identically over a plaquette and bond, when S is expressed in terms of either plaquette or bond operators, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%
“…This difference attributes to the fact that AFM ground state breaks the full symmetry of the Heisenberg Hamiltonian, while the singlet ground states in this study do not. Emergence of multiple topological phases in irradiated tightbinding and FM Kitaev-Heisenberg models on this lattice is noted before 25,26 . The effect of DMI cannot be registered either in POT or BOT because of the fact that, n (S n × S n+1 ) z vanishes identically over a plaquette and bond, when S is expressed in terms of either plaquette or bond operators, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 54%