2018
DOI: 10.1007/s11139-017-9976-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topological strings, quiver varieties, and Rogers–Ramanujan identities

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 49 publications
1
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Fourth, the role and the meaning of quivers that we identify should be understood in all other systems related to or engineered by topological string theory, such as supersymmetric gauge theories, vortex counting, etc. Fifth, it is of interest to understand if there are relations between quivers that we identify in this paper, and other quivers identified in related contexts [31][32][33][34]. Sixth, it is tempting to relate the combinatorics of quivers that we identify to crystal models related to the topological vertex.…”
Section: A Brief Quantitative Summarymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Fourth, the role and the meaning of quivers that we identify should be understood in all other systems related to or engineered by topological string theory, such as supersymmetric gauge theories, vortex counting, etc. Fifth, it is of interest to understand if there are relations between quivers that we identify in this paper, and other quivers identified in related contexts [31][32][33][34]. Sixth, it is tempting to relate the combinatorics of quivers that we identify to crystal models related to the topological vertex.…”
Section: A Brief Quantitative Summarymentioning
confidence: 98%
“…These are prototype and important examples of quivers, and properties of their moduli spaces were discussed in [15,16]. The relation of this family of quivers to LMOV invariants of framed unknot (equivalently extremal invariants of twist knots, or open topological string amplitudes for branes in C 3 geometry) was presented in [10], and discussed also in [11,12]. Consider now the generating function of the full unknot invariants (5.1) -or equivalently open topological string amplitudes for branes in the resolved conifold geometry.…”
Section: Unknotmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [2-4, 7, 8], as well as for some infinite families of knots and representations [9,10]. In particular, in [10] the relation of the framed unknot invariants (equivalently extremal invariants of twist knots, as well as open topological string amplitudes for branes in C 3 geometry) to motivic Donaldson-Thomas invariants of the m-loop quiver was found, which led to the proof of integrality of BPS numbers in those cases; this relation was then analyzed and discussed also in [11,12].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To illustrate the above structure, let us consider the first two knots in this series. The value p = 1 corresponds to (3,5) torus knot. In this case we only have B 1,1 matrix, which is built out of X 1,1 and Y 1,1 , and takes form (5.8)…”
Section: (3 3p + 2) Torus Knotsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example for the (3,5) and (3,8) To obtain the standard form of the HOMFLY-PT polynomial -right-handed with the zero framing -the quiver matrix has to be transformed as explained in the section 2.2. For example the C (3,5) quiver in this case becomes The t degrees defined in (5.12) can be read off from the diagonal of this matrix. From quivers that we found above, extremal colored HOMLFY-PT polynomials for (3, 3p+2) torus knots can be determined using (2.25).…”
Section: (3 3p + 2) Torus Knotsmentioning
confidence: 99%