1982
DOI: 10.1016/0022-4049(82)90092-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topologized objects in categories and the Sullivan profinite completion

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

1985
1985
2002
2002

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Some of the definitions below are chosen after [10]. For any category C and an object X of C a topologized object over X is a factorization…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some of the definitions below are chosen after [10]. For any category C and an object X of C a topologized object over X is a factorization…”
Section: Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We can also use /?-finite or, for finite rings R, Ä-finite, spaces here. In this sense we have just answered Adams's questions (see also [9]) about an idempotent completion for topologized objects.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, developing the "genetics of homotopy theory", Sullivan [24] remarked that a simple rigid completion functor could prove useful. A. Deleanu [9] defined the Sullivan completion on the topologized homotopy category, but left the question of idempotency open.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%