2021
DOI: 10.2514/1.j059550
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology and Shape Optimization of Ultrathin Composite Self-Deployable Shell Structures with Cutouts

Abstract: The paper presents topology optimization studies of selfs-deployable joints in thin-walled tubular structures. The joints are made entirely of ultra-thin, fiber reinforced composite materials. The objective of this research is to strategically position cutouts on the joints so that they can fold without failing, while maximizing the deployed bending stiffness. The optimal shape and position of cutouts are the results of concurrent topology optimization of these composite, thin-shell joints with geometrical non… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
7
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2025
2025

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 46 publications
1
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…We note that the implicit relation (7) does not define the function g(C, ϕ) uniquely, implying that other choices of the functions Ψ p from (12) and Ψ m from (13) are possible. A good agreement with experiments is still attained, suggesting that the buckling behavior of the sheet is robust with respect to the choice of the function g. In principle, the effective elasticity parameters λ, µ, η and B are functions of the geometric parameters and would vary in space if not for the fact that l 1 , l 2 and δ are constant throughout the sheets, yielding a uniform spatial distribution of joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…We note that the implicit relation (7) does not define the function g(C, ϕ) uniquely, implying that other choices of the functions Ψ p from (12) and Ψ m from (13) are possible. A good agreement with experiments is still attained, suggesting that the buckling behavior of the sheet is robust with respect to the choice of the function g. In principle, the effective elasticity parameters λ, µ, η and B are functions of the geometric parameters and would vary in space if not for the fact that l 1 , l 2 and δ are constant throughout the sheets, yielding a uniform spatial distribution of joints.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…where J = √ det(C), Ī1 = tr(C)J −1 , µ and λ are the Lamé parameters and Ψ p is given in (12). Our bending energy density functions is…”
Section: Strain Energymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The preparation of these particular composite hinges has been described previously along with their positioning performance with integrated actuators [9,23]. It should be noted that the current work can be implemented on many other deployable structures as well as with varying types of hinge mechanisms [24][25][26][27][28]. The deploy and stow of the structure is controlled by hand, and is stowed and deployed on the order of 15 s for each.…”
Section: Experiments and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Pellegrion from Caltech investigated a bistable cylindrical shell, and a comprehensive analytical model was developed which could predict the residual stress distribution and bistable configurations of the shell [8][9][10]. Further, Pellegrino also concentrated on the analysis of multi-stable morphing structures, for instance, self-deployable shells, in the recent work for extending the applications of the FRP composite materials [11][12][13].…”
Section: Introduction and Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%