2019
DOI: 10.1103/physrevb.100.165103
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology- and symmetry-protected domain wall conduction in quantum Hall nematics

Abstract: We consider domain walls in nematic quantum Hall ferromagnets predicted to form in multivalley semiconductors, recently probed by scanning tunneling microscopy experiments on Bi(111) surfaces [Randeria et. al., in preparation [1]]. We show that the domain wall properties depend sensitively on the filling factor ν of the underlying (integer) quantum Hall states. For ν = 1 and in the absence of impurity scattering we argue that the wall hosts a single-channel Luttinger liquid whose gaplessness is a consequence o… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

1
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 34 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These domain walls (DWs) are our focus below-note that these are distinct from the helical states that have been observed between AB/BA stacking regions in an electric field [24]. Similar DWs in QHFMs have been studied previously [25][26][27][28][29][30] and have been visualized on the surface of bismuth via scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [31]. As in QHFMs, DWs in magic-angle TBG generically host a pair of gapless dispersing one-dimensional modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…These domain walls (DWs) are our focus below-note that these are distinct from the helical states that have been observed between AB/BA stacking regions in an electric field [24]. Similar DWs in QHFMs have been studied previously [25][26][27][28][29][30] and have been visualized on the surface of bismuth via scanning tunneling microscopy (STM) [31]. As in QHFMs, DWs in magic-angle TBG generically host a pair of gapless dispersing one-dimensional modes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 70%
“…However, as we show here, in certain parameter regimes the edge modes of energetically stable DWs in TBG are chiral (copropagating) rather than counter-propagating. Hence universal aspects of chiral Luttinger liquid physics can emerge in this setting, that are absent in QHFM-DWs due to corrections from interactions between counterpropagating modes [29].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We concentrate here on the ferroelectric states where two valleys are described by the tilted massless Dirac cone with the same axis orientation and velocity ratio but opposite tilt. We expect the states at the Landau level n = +3 to essentially carry over to the case of bismuth surfaces [3][4][5][6]. In the Supplemental Material [22], we also present a nematic model of two valleys with anisotropic masses whose principal axes are rotated by π/2, as in AlAs quantum wells [7,8], which gives a simpler picture of what we find.…”
mentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Introduction. Recently, we have witnessed an explosion of high-quality two-dimensional electronic systems with strongly anisotropic dispersions that can be driven into the quantum Hall regime in the presence of strong magnetic fields [1,2], such as the (111) surface of bismuth [3][4][5][6], AlAs heterostructures [7,8], PbTe(111) quantum wells [9], and the (001) surface of a topological crystalline insulator (TCI) such as Sn 1−x Pb x (Te, Se) [10]. In these systems, at integer fillings of the Landau levels, the Coulomb interaction tends to spontaneously break symmetry by forming valleypolarized states [1,[11][12][13], which can be generally divided into nematic or ferroelectric states according to whether or not the Fermi surface of an individual valley preserves inversion (or twofold rotation) symmetry [1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The authors further show that depending on the fillingν of valley-degenerate Landau levels, the low-energy domain wall modes at the same location on the sample is either gapless within the experimental resolution (forν = 1), or has a small tunneling gap (forν = 2). This difference is attributed to an allowed inter-valley scattering process at the domain wall forν = 2, which breaks the valley symmetry protecting the topological boundary modes [4].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%