2021
DOI: 10.1007/s00366-021-01552-y
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology-based geometry optimization for a new compliant mechanism using improved adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference system and neural network algorithm

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The achieved frequency from the present method and two DE and NNA were almost similar, as given in Table 5. In comparison with other optimization methods, the proposed method was compared with the differential evolutionary algorithm (DE) [35] and neural network algorithm (NNA) [36]. The achieved frequency from the present method and two DE and NNA were almost similar, as given in Table 5.…”
Section: Fea Validation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The achieved frequency from the present method and two DE and NNA were almost similar, as given in Table 5. In comparison with other optimization methods, the proposed method was compared with the differential evolutionary algorithm (DE) [35] and neural network algorithm (NNA) [36]. The achieved frequency from the present method and two DE and NNA were almost similar, as given in Table 5.…”
Section: Fea Validation and Comparisonmentioning
confidence: 79%
“…This process is computationally demanding and one way to approach it is through sequential optimization, since it allows for finding optimal solutions in the different application stages. The constraints of the target functions for optimization must be precise and well defined, because the performance of the final optimal design depends on them [18]. Neglecting them can produce economically optimal but structurally unacceptable designs or vice versa [19].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although the objective pursued by this methodology is the same as in most of the revised design methodologies, most of the latter prioritize a single point of view when generating the designs, which means that the proposed solutions only satisfy the point of view under which they were created ( [18,19,21,30,[41][42][43]). In this sense, the difference between the methodology proposed in this work and the others is that the first integrates and responds to the needs of the three design points of view (client, designer and community).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Saxena and Ananthasuresh adopted path-generating mechanisms as guiding principles [20], and Nishiwaki et al introduced a homogenization-based optimization tailored for enhanced flexibility [21]. These methodologies typically employ multi-objective functions to quantify flexibility, demonstrated through numerous numerical examples [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%