2012
DOI: 10.1002/nme.4329
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology design of reactive mufflers for enhancing their acoustic attenuation performance and flow characteristics simultaneously

Abstract: SUMMARY When seeking to enhance the acoustic attenuation performance of a reactive muffler, it is necessary to ensure that the flow resistance does not increase significantly. To date, there have been very few attempts to simultaneously optimize the transmission loss and pressure drop of a muffler. In this study, a multiobjective topology optimization problem is formulated to maximize the transmission loss at a target frequency and minimize the pressure drop simultaneously. The objective function in the formul… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
16
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
1
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Figure 9 compares the optimized topologies depending on the target frequency for α = 1.3: TL opt = 5.20 dB from TL ini = 1.64 dB at f t = 100 Hz, TL opt = 19.71 dB from TL ini = 16.85 dB at f t = 125 Hz, TL opt = 54.66 dB from TL ini = 48.87 dB at f t = 200 Hz, and TL opt = 44.16 dB from TL ini = 43.57 dB at f t = 250 Hz. These results imply that the optimal topology for the TL maximization was significantly affected by the target frequency, consistent with prior studies (Lee and Kim 2009;Lee and Jang 2012). However, the effect of α on the optimal topology was almost negligible.…”
Section: Topology-optimization Problem IIsupporting
confidence: 81%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Figure 9 compares the optimized topologies depending on the target frequency for α = 1.3: TL opt = 5.20 dB from TL ini = 1.64 dB at f t = 100 Hz, TL opt = 19.71 dB from TL ini = 16.85 dB at f t = 125 Hz, TL opt = 54.66 dB from TL ini = 48.87 dB at f t = 200 Hz, and TL opt = 44.16 dB from TL ini = 43.57 dB at f t = 250 Hz. These results imply that the optimal topology for the TL maximization was significantly affected by the target frequency, consistent with prior studies (Lee and Kim 2009;Lee and Jang 2012). However, the effect of α on the optimal topology was almost negligible.…”
Section: Topology-optimization Problem IIsupporting
confidence: 81%
“…This method requires sensitivity analysis of the compliance and TL with respect to each design variable. Equations (20) and (21) were used in the topologyoptimization problems (Lee and Jang 2012;Sigmund 2001). The differentiations of the acoustic pressure at three points with respect to each design variable were calculated using the formulation suggested by Lee and Kim (2009).…”
Section: Numerical Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To this end, the interpolation function should be carefully selected, and the choice of Eqs. (11a) and (11b) has been validated in several acoustical topology optimization problems [22,24,27,31].…”
Section: Acoustical Topology Optimization Formulationmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Since rigid body elements form rigid partitions, the objective function suitably represents the first design goal of minimizing the partition volume. In addition, since the TL value at a target frequency decreases as the number of rigid body elements decreases [27,31], one inequality condition for a TL value at each target frequency suitably represents the second design goal of achieving the target TL value.…”
Section: Acoustical Topology Optimization Formulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, flow in the duct and chamber of muffler is commonly unsteady, complex and turbulent, which generates noise by itself. The flow induced noise should be carefully considered for design and optimization of the muffler, especially at high speed [1][2][3][4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%