2009
DOI: 10.1063/1.2981796
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology of the quantum control landscape for observables

Abstract: A broad class of quantum control problems entails optimizing the expectation value of an observable operator through tailored unitary propagation of the system density matrix. Such optimization processes can be viewed as a directed search over a quantum control landscape. The attainment of the global extrema of this landscape is the goal of quantum control. Local optima will generally exist, and their enumeration is shown to scale factorially with the system's effective Hilbert space dimension. A Hessian analy… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
52
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

4
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(52 citation statements)
references
References 58 publications
0
52
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the kinematic formulation, it has also been shown that the sufficient and necessary condition for U T to be a critical point of the landscape is that the final-time density matrix ρ(T ) = U T ρ 0 U † T commutes with the target observable θ [98,105,106], i.e.,…”
Section: B Formulation and Landscape Topology Of The Control Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the kinematic formulation, it has also been shown that the sufficient and necessary condition for U T to be a critical point of the landscape is that the final-time density matrix ρ(T ) = U T ρ 0 U † T commutes with the target observable θ [98,105,106], i.e.,…”
Section: B Formulation and Landscape Topology Of The Control Objectivementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several recent studies [97][98][99] strongly indicate that the success of numerous OCEs and OCT simulations is related to the favorable topology of the quantum control landscape defined by the functional dependence of J on ε(t) [7,9,100]. In particular, it has been shown that the control landscape lacks local optima (referred to as traps) if three conditions are satisfied: (i) the quantum system is controllable, i.e., any unitary evolution operator can be produced by some admissible control field beyond some finite time; (ii) the Jacobian matrix mapping the control field ε(t) to the final-time evolution operator U (T, 0) is of full rank everywhere on the landscape; (iii) there are no constraints on the control field [98,[101][102][103][104][105][106][107][108]. The absence of local suboptimal extrema is of central importance to optimization; numerical studies have described the appearance of local traps on the control landscape due to the violation of assumption (i) [109] and shown that the violation of assumption (ii) [110] can, in special cases, prevent a gradient search from identifying globally optimal controls.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The success of a growing number of optimal control experiments, as well as vast numbers of simulations, led to the formulation of a key theorem referred to here as the landscape principle. The principle states that upon satisfaction of assumptions (sufficient conditions) about * hrabitz@princeton.edu the controllability, surjectivity, and available resources, the topology of quantum control landscapes for systems with a finite number of states allows for facile determination of optimal controls [6][7][8].…”
Section: = [H 0 + V (Xt) + G(xt)|ψ(xt)| 2 ]ψ(Xt) (1)mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The quantum control landscape defined by this functional dependence has been depicted in experimental studies for various control problems [119][120][121][122][123][124][125][126], and its favorable topology [9,127] has been correlated [128][129][130] to the success of OCEs and OCT simulations. Specifically, it has been shown [129,[131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138] that the landscapes for N -level closed quantum systems lack local optima if three conditions are satisfied: (1) the quantum system is controllable, i.e., any given unitary evolution can be generated by some control field in finite time; (2) the Jacobian of the map from the control field ε(t) to the final-time evolution operator U (T, 0) is of full rank; (3) the control field is unconstrained. We discuss these conditions in more detail in Sec.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%