2017
DOI: 10.1016/j.jmsy.2017.03.006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization and additive manufacturing: Comparison of conception methods using industrial codes

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
53
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 109 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Especially in the case of metal components, the interest of the industry is growing exponentially [1] because AM allows the production of fully dense near-net-shaped parts with complex structures made with excellent materials [2]. In fact, the main advantage of AM over conventional subtractive or formative methods is clearly illustrated by the greater product functionality that can be achieved by proper exploitation of the freedom in design [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Especially in the case of metal components, the interest of the industry is growing exponentially [1] because AM allows the production of fully dense near-net-shaped parts with complex structures made with excellent materials [2]. In fact, the main advantage of AM over conventional subtractive or formative methods is clearly illustrated by the greater product functionality that can be achieved by proper exploitation of the freedom in design [3,4].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Most CAD software typically offers packages for topology optimization based on environmental structure and/or thermal loads, whereby, the software will determine a geometry that safely withstands the prescribed environment while simultaneously minimizing a design metric such as mass or operating temperature capability [121]. These techniques, while successful in designing complex geometries, are mainly based on preliminary design and final function, and not the AM processing parameters.…”
Section: Emerging Metal-am Applications For Modeling and Simulationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…These benefits include reduction in manufacturing costs through lower material usage and shorter print times, and potential reduction in the component's distortions and residual stresses. Several tools and techniques have been widely adapted for lightweighting in AM design, including the use of topology, shape and size optimization, and inclusion of lattice structures [2,[5][6][7]. An example of how topology optimization can be used in component design is described in Figure 1, where a hydraulic valve block has been redesigned for Nurmi Cylinders Oy [8].…”
Section: Materials Minimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%