2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.cma.2019.112641
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization for energy dissipation design of lattice structures through snap-through behavior

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
18
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 56 publications
0
18
0
Order By: Relevance
“…An adjoint method and the chain rule are employed here to obtain the sensitivities with respect to the design variables. More details regarding sensitivity analysis of buckling‐induced design can be found in Reference .…”
Section: Buckling‐induced Topology Optimization Design Based On P‐gsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…An adjoint method and the chain rule are employed here to obtain the sensitivities with respect to the design variables. More details regarding sensitivity analysis of buckling‐induced design can be found in Reference .…”
Section: Buckling‐induced Topology Optimization Design Based On P‐gsmmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Guo and Zhang et al proposed a homogenization framework with the use of asymptotic analysis to achieve the fast design of devices filled with quasiperiodic microstructure, where a mapping function is implemented to transform an infill graded microstructure to a spatially periodic configuration. Some other advanced multiscale design methods for simultaneous achieving macro‐ and microscale topology optimization or nonlinear metamaterial design can be found in References .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] Meanwhile, several other advanced TO methods are proposed in recent years. [24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32] In recent years, designing the flexible electronics, soft robots and wearable electronic devices draw great attention from academia and industry due to their extraordinary mechanical response. [33][34][35] Such devices and structures usually experience large deformations under external loading conditions, which is different from the traditional stiff structure design.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Kato et al 47 proposes a method of micro-macro concurrent TO for a two-phase nonlinear solid to minimize the end compliance of its microstructure undergoing large deformation. Some other related works can be found in References 28,30,48,49. For structures experiencing large deformation, local buckling phenomenon always happens, which makes the force-displacement response highly nonlinear. Compared with TO design under finite deformation, designing buckling-induced device is more challenging.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This method has been developed to allow for complete design freedom by varying the local density of the structure, and therefore does not require a description and parametrization of the geometry beforehand. [23] While topology optimization was initially used to solve mechanical design problems such as maximizing structural stiffness using a limited amount of material, [24][25][26] it gradually expanded towards other research areas such as optics, [27][28][29][30] phononics, [31] material science, [32][33][34] and fluid mechanics. [35] Importantly, most of the algorithms use gradient information of the objective function and constraints to reach a local or global minimum.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%