2006
DOI: 10.1007/s00158-006-0019-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology optimization for minimum mass design considering local failure constraints and contact boundary conditions

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

1
35
0
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
1
35
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] There are two main difficulties associated with stress constraints when the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) approach is used for material parameterization. The first difficulty consists in the local nature of material failure constraints, which provides a major challenge due to the large number of stress constraints and their high nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…[23][24][25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36] There are two main difficulties associated with stress constraints when the solid isotropic material with penalization (SIMP) approach is used for material parameterization. The first difficulty consists in the local nature of material failure constraints, which provides a major challenge due to the large number of stress constraints and their high nonlinearity.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can use an augmented Lagrangian algorithm, which proved to be a mathematically consistent alternative with reasonable computational cost. [24][25][26]33,35 The other important issue that must be considered is the singularity phenomenon. There are 2 main techniques used to relax the design space: the qp approach 27 and the -relaxed approach.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Petersson and Patriksson (1997) presented a pioneering work on the topology optimization of sheets in unilateral contact resorting to a sub-gradient method. A contact problem including Coulomb friction was tackled in Fancello (2006) through a penalization approach, while Mankame and Ananthasuresh (2004) extended investigations to the optimal design of compliant mechanisms introducing a regularized contact model. The very recent work in Strömberg and Klarbring (2010) addresses contact problems in the three-dimensional framework treating the Signorini's conditions by the augmented Lagrangian approach along with a smooth approximation technique.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A pioneering work on topology optimization of structures in unilateral contact is Petersson and Patriksson [7]. A more recent work is Fancello [8]. Another recent work is Mankame and Ananthasuresh [9], where compliant mechanisms were generated by including contact conditions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%