2018
DOI: 10.1155/2018/7849153
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology Optimization of Constrained Layer Damping Structures Subjected to Stationary Random Excitation

Abstract: This paper deals with an optimal layout design of the constrained layer damping (CLD) treatment of vibrating structures subjected to stationary random excitation. The root mean square (RMS) of random response is defined as the objective function as it can be used to represent the vibration level in practice. To circumvent the computationally expensive sensitivity analysis, an efficient optimization procedure integrating the pseudoexcitation method (PEM) and the double complex modal superposition method is intr… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 26 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…First, the relationship of motion between layers is considered a weak-core assumption, [21] is applied as the modulus of elasticity of the middle viscoelastic layer, it is smaller than that of the beam, and the constraint layer in the structure of the laminated layer in which the axial load is applied. Te longitudinal displacement of layer 1 and layer 3 has the following relationship:…”
Section: Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…First, the relationship of motion between layers is considered a weak-core assumption, [21] is applied as the modulus of elasticity of the middle viscoelastic layer, it is smaller than that of the beam, and the constraint layer in the structure of the laminated layer in which the axial load is applied. Te longitudinal displacement of layer 1 and layer 3 has the following relationship:…”
Section: Approximationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To optimize the position of a passive patch, Zheng et al minimized the length and position of the patch by using a genetic algorithm based on the penalty function method [17,18]. Lei and Zheng have optimized the passive patch location through topological optimization of the penalization model [19,20], and Fang has used the level set method [21]. Araujo et al performed optimization using the Feasible Arc Interior Point Algorithm (FAIPA) to derive the maximum loss factor [22].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Takezawa et al [26] proposed complex dynamic compliance as objective function for optimizing damping materials to reduce the resonance peak response. Fang et al [27] proposed an efficient optimization procedure integrating the Pseudoexcitation Method (PEM) and the double complex modal superposition method to optimize the layout of the CLD structures subjected to stationary random excitation. Chen and Liu [28] investigated the optimal microstructural configuration of the viscoelastic material to improve the damping characteristics of the macrostructures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%