Volume 2: 29th Design Automation Conference, Parts a and B 2003
DOI: 10.1115/detc2003/dac-48730
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology Optimization of Multi-Component Structures via Decomposition-Based Assembly Synthesis

Abstract: A method is presented for synthesizing multi-component structural assemblies with maximum structural performance and manufacturability. The problem is posed as a relaxation of decomposition-based assembly synthesis [1,2,3], where both topology and decomposition of a structure are regarded as variables over a ground structure with non-overlapping beams. A multi-objective genetic algorithm [4,5] with graph-based crossover [6,7,8], coupled with FEM analyses, is used to obtain Pareto optimal solutions to this prob… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2004
2004
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The goal of this work was to move away from the bulky articulated rigid body mechanisms previously analyzed and instead design a prosthetic foot structure consting of a single part that, in response to specific loading scenarios, deforms elastically in such a way as to achieve a desired output motion, that is, a compliant mechanism [22]. There is a plethora of literature on topology synthesis and optimization for compliant mechanisms [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] including continuum element density approaches, frame element-based structures, and pseudo-rigid body models. However, the outputs of these topology optimizations have several practical limitations; for example, they consist only of uniform elements or uniform cross-sections, have unclear boundaries or checkerboard patterns, or they result in localized flexural hinges with high stress concentrations [30].…”
Section: Compliant Mechanism Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The goal of this work was to move away from the bulky articulated rigid body mechanisms previously analyzed and instead design a prosthetic foot structure consting of a single part that, in response to specific loading scenarios, deforms elastically in such a way as to achieve a desired output motion, that is, a compliant mechanism [22]. There is a plethora of literature on topology synthesis and optimization for compliant mechanisms [23][24][25][26][27][28][29] including continuum element density approaches, frame element-based structures, and pseudo-rigid body models. However, the outputs of these topology optimizations have several practical limitations; for example, they consist only of uniform elements or uniform cross-sections, have unclear boundaries or checkerboard patterns, or they result in localized flexural hinges with high stress concentrations [30].…”
Section: Compliant Mechanism Optimizationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An advantage of a GA, used in structural optimization, is that they require few initial parameters and permit the optimization of continuous and discrete variables and less restricted search. However, to ensure convergence, engineering experience is essential for the definition of the main operations used in GA, such as: crossover, mutation and reproduction (Lyu and Saitou, 2003). The purpose of this study is to define a proper representation and its related genetic operators that would help to reach optimal solutions.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A modified Non-Dominated Sorting Genetic Algorithm-II (NSGA-II) [7] is adopted for the above problem due to the discrete nature of the design variables, and its ability to solve multi-objective problems without predefined weight or bounds. Some enhancements to the conventional NSGA-II are made in the niching based on the distances in object function space and the stochastic universal sampling, which was successfully applied in our previous work [9].…”
Section: Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the information in x, y, and z are linked to the physical geometry of structure, the conventional one point or multiple point crossover for linear chromosomes [13] are ineffective in preserving high-quality building blocks. For this type of problems, direct crossover has been successfully applied to improve the performance [8,9], whose details can be found in [3] along with the description of the modified NSGA-II.…”
Section: Optimization Problemmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation