2018
DOI: 10.1061/(asce)st.1943-541x.0002156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Topology Optimization of Tensegrity Structures Considering Buckling Constraints

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 28 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This means that the absolute size of the weight coefficients is not important, and the real importance is the relative size between the weight coefficients. In order to separate the weight coefficients of two adjacent priorities as far as possible, it means that 0 << ω 1 << ω 2 << • • • << ω p (15) a heuristic weight coefficient assignment strategy is proposed as ω r = α p r (16) where α is a positive number that greater than 1, such as 3, and p r denotes the order of the r th length type. On the selection of α, trial computations indicate that a too small α will lead to a small gap between the two adjacent weight coefficients, and it is difficult to adjust the weight coefficients to assign higher priority to the expected members; on the contrary, a too large α will generate excessive weight coefficients that will cause numerical errors in the computation.…”
Section: Weight Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This means that the absolute size of the weight coefficients is not important, and the real importance is the relative size between the weight coefficients. In order to separate the weight coefficients of two adjacent priorities as far as possible, it means that 0 << ω 1 << ω 2 << • • • << ω p (15) a heuristic weight coefficient assignment strategy is proposed as ω r = α p r (16) where α is a positive number that greater than 1, such as 3, and p r denotes the order of the r th length type. On the selection of α, trial computations indicate that a too small α will lead to a small gap between the two adjacent weight coefficients, and it is difficult to adjust the weight coefficients to assign higher priority to the expected members; on the contrary, a too large α will generate excessive weight coefficients that will cause numerical errors in the computation.…”
Section: Weight Coefficientmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Tensegrity form design can be divided into the following three categories: form-finding [9][10][11] , force-finding [12,13] , and topology-finding [14,15] . Specifically, the topology-finding (also referred to as topology optimization [16,17] or topology design [18,19] ) of tensegrity structures is an emerging scheme proposed in recent years that is a powerful tool to design tensegrity structures with specified shapes. Similar to the topology optimization of conventional structures, member connectivities are treated as the main variables in the topology-finding of tensegrity structures.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Regarding Discrete Optimisation, methods for considering buckling also evolved. Among a recent contribution, one can highlight the work by Weldeyesus and Tugilimana on trusses [397,448], Xu et al suggested a practical approach for TO in tensegrity structures [449,450], as well as the research by Zhao et al [451] on methods for mitigating member instability in reticulated structures.…”
Section: Buckling and Local Instability Phenomenamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Topology optimization methods have also been proposed to design passive tensegrity structures (Kanno 2013;. For example, least-weight tensegrity structures have been obtained through discrete structural topology optimization based on mixed-integer linear programming subject to equilibrium and stress constraints in (Kanno 2013) as well as to buckling constraints in (Xu et al 2018).…”
Section: Previous Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Cable and strut elements are represented by thin and thick lines, respectively. This novel tensegrity configuration was obtained through a topology optimization formulation given in (Xu et al 2018), and its mechanical properties have been studied in (Li et al 2020). This system is a class 2 tensegrity structure, according to the definition given in (Skelton and Oliveira 2009).…”
Section: Numerical Examplesmentioning
confidence: 99%