2013
DOI: 10.1091/mbc.e12-07-0524
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

TOR and RAS pathways regulate desiccation tolerance inSaccharomyces cerevisiae

Abstract: Desiccation is thought to impose many stresses. Which of these stresses is responsible for desiccation-induced death and how the stress response is regulated are unknown, however. Here we use Saccharomyces cerevisiae to show that reduction of a 60S biogenesis intermediate via RAS or TOR down-regulation increases desiccation tolerance.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

4
30
1
1

Year Published

2013
2013
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 48 publications
(36 citation statements)
references
References 48 publications
4
30
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…To assess percentage relative viability of samples using flow cytometry, the number of cells categorized as viable, based on a lack of fluorescence, was divided by the number of total cells counted and multiplied by 100. The values of culture viability (% relative viability) we observed using the standard plating method were the same as those previously observed in our laboratory: exponential phase wild-type cultures were 0.00004 ± 0.00003% viable, stationary phase wild-type cultures were 40 ± 11% viable and stationary phase petite cells were 0.007 ± 0.007% viable [value ± standard error of the mean (SEM)] (Calahan et al, 2011;Welch et al, 2013). Culture viability as determined by the tadpoling method was not significantly different from plating: exponential phase wild-type cultures were 0.00008 ± 0.00006% viable, stationary phase wild-type cultures were 23 ± 6% viable and stationary phase petite cells were 0.002 ± 0.002% viable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…To assess percentage relative viability of samples using flow cytometry, the number of cells categorized as viable, based on a lack of fluorescence, was divided by the number of total cells counted and multiplied by 100. The values of culture viability (% relative viability) we observed using the standard plating method were the same as those previously observed in our laboratory: exponential phase wild-type cultures were 0.00004 ± 0.00003% viable, stationary phase wild-type cultures were 40 ± 11% viable and stationary phase petite cells were 0.007 ± 0.007% viable [value ± standard error of the mean (SEM)] (Calahan et al, 2011;Welch et al, 2013). Culture viability as determined by the tadpoling method was not significantly different from plating: exponential phase wild-type cultures were 0.00008 ± 0.00006% viable, stationary phase wild-type cultures were 23 ± 6% viable and stationary phase petite cells were 0.002 ± 0.002% viable.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 68%
“…To obtain cultures with reduced viability on which to test these methods, we utilized desiccation. Desiccated cultures have been shown to vary greatly in their survival rates from 20% to 0.0001%, depending on their genetic background or growth conditions (Calahan et al, 2011;Welch et al, 2013). We prepared cultures of cells that have been shown to vary greatly in desiccation tolerancestationary phase and exponential phase wild-type cells, and stationary phase petite cells (mrpl16Δ).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1A). Thus, inactivating intracellular trehalases increased both a cell's ability to accumulate intracellular trehalose and conferred the highest induced desiccation tolerance recorded for logarithmically growing cells (8,9,18).…”
Section: Import Of Extracellular Trehalose Confers Robust Desiccationmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…Moreover, the osmolyte accumulation under drought can lead to misfolding and aggregation of proteins [39], and these changes can potentially limit cells' responses to desiccation [40]. Therefore, to better understand the drought resistant mechanism in E. pusillum, we investigated the expression changes of genes commonly involved in the response to stresses in other organisms, such as oxidative stress, osmotic regulation and post-translational processing under our drought treatment.…”
Section: The Expression Changes Of Gene Commonly Involved In Stress Rmentioning
confidence: 99%