2019
DOI: 10.1016/j.eswa.2019.01.029
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

ToRank: Identifying the most influential suspicious domains in the Tor network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
61
0
4

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(65 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
61
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…IDU is initialized with a list of onion domains that were classified as illegal -using TCU -along with their extracted features -using TMU -to assign each onion domain a rank value that reflects its popularity among the rest. In our work, we explore two ranking approaches: link-based (Al-Nabki et al, 2019c) and content-based (Al-Nabki et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Influence Detection Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…IDU is initialized with a list of onion domains that were classified as illegal -using TCU -along with their extracted features -using TMU -to assign each onion domain a rank value that reflects its popularity among the rest. In our work, we explore two ranking approaches: link-based (Al-Nabki et al, 2019c) and content-based (Al-Nabki et al, 2019a).…”
Section: Influence Detection Unitmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Later, the growing risk of the suspicious activities practiced on the Darknet called the attention of researchers to dive into this network and explore its content (Graczyk and Kinningham, 2015;Moore and Rid, 2016;Park et al, 2018;Dalins et al, 2018;Dong et al, 2018;Takaaki and Atsuo, 2019;Al-Nabki et al, 2019c). Concerning the Deep Web, Xu et al (2007) presented a supervised text classification framework and used Information Gain (IG) to extract features from the text.…”
Section: Supervised Classification Techniquesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations