2015
DOI: 10.1016/j.cities.2015.06.009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toronto’s governance crisis: A global city under pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…A number of scholars have documented the implications of the 1998 forced amalgamation of the six former municipalities of Metro Toronto (Toronto, York, East York, North York, Scarborough, and Etobicoke) into the single “Mega City” of Toronto (Isin ; Keil ; Frisken ; Sancton ; Joy and Vogel ). For the present purposes it is enough to recognize that “amalgamation was a response to a number of political and ideological issues, including a desire to suburbanize Toronto politics, reduce the scope of government in social service provision, and to make the city government more responsive to business influence” (Joy and Vogel , 40). Put bluntly, amalgamation eroded the “liberal‐progressive political regime that had existed in the downtown core” (Keil and Boudreau , 51), thereby opening a political space for new actors to assert the combined logic of both rollout and rollback neoliberalism.…”
Section: Olympic Bidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…A number of scholars have documented the implications of the 1998 forced amalgamation of the six former municipalities of Metro Toronto (Toronto, York, East York, North York, Scarborough, and Etobicoke) into the single “Mega City” of Toronto (Isin ; Keil ; Frisken ; Sancton ; Joy and Vogel ). For the present purposes it is enough to recognize that “amalgamation was a response to a number of political and ideological issues, including a desire to suburbanize Toronto politics, reduce the scope of government in social service provision, and to make the city government more responsive to business influence” (Joy and Vogel , 40). Put bluntly, amalgamation eroded the “liberal‐progressive political regime that had existed in the downtown core” (Keil and Boudreau , 51), thereby opening a political space for new actors to assert the combined logic of both rollout and rollback neoliberalism.…”
Section: Olympic Bidmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The result was a form of “dissociated governance” (Keil , ) as the community‐based vision inspired by David Crombie was replaced with a new plan that, although directing money and attention to Toronto, signaled the increased centralization of decision‐making. Planning in post‐amalgamation Toronto has become “development‐friendly, technocratic, and apolitical” with many marginalized groups having “little political voice” (Joy and Vogel , 49).…”
Section: Olympic Bidmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Income polarisation, inequality and segregation along class and racial lines have in fact become the defining characteristics of Toronto (Joy and Vogel 2015;Siemiatycki 2011). As a result, many immigrants have settled in inner-suburban areas of Toronto (in particular Scarborough and North York), characterised by their concentrated poverty, high resident turn-over, poor infrastructure, gang presence and gun violence (Joy and Vogel 2015). Table 1 presents an overview of the general characteristics of Jane-Finch and Toronto.…”
Section: Methods and Contextmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Bratzel, 1999;Buehler and Pucher, 2011;Joy and Vogel, 2015). The framing effects of context are thus important for researchers and practitioners to reflect over.…”
Section: Conclusion On Rq1mentioning
confidence: 99%