2011
DOI: 10.5802/aif.2664
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torsion and Tamagawa numbers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2016
2016
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
2

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 24 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 53 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case where A (hence A ∨ ) has everywhere semistable reduction, this conjecture was proved by Werner (cf. [Wer97, Proposition 5.1], if one takes into account the residue fields, see [Lo11]). The fourth equality follows from the fact that the pairing is non-degenerate and the fact that our base field k is finite.…”
Section: Appendix : Invariance Of Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the case where A (hence A ∨ ) has everywhere semistable reduction, this conjecture was proved by Werner (cf. [Wer97, Proposition 5.1], if one takes into account the residue fields, see [Lo11]). The fourth equality follows from the fact that the pairing is non-degenerate and the fact that our base field k is finite.…”
Section: Appendix : Invariance Of Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Let B/K be an abelian variety and f : A → B an isogeny of degree a power of p. Then : Proof. For the proof of item (2) see [Lo11]) and for the others see [Mil72,§1].…”
Section: Appendix : Invariance Of Statementsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus the left-hand vertical map is an isomorphism as well, which completes the proof. In the case where R ′ /R is a finite extension of discrete valuation rings, the isomorphism of Corollary 4.2 was discussed in [15,Proposition 3.19] when the associated extension of fraction fields K ′ /K is Galois, k is perfect and G ′ is the Néron model of an abelian variety over K ′ . Corollary 4.1 is proved in [2, Proposition 1.1] (see also [9, proof of Theorem 1]) when K ′ /K is separable, G ′ is as above and R is henselian.…”
Section: Some Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…So assume that E d (Q) contains a Q-rational point of order 3. A theorem of Lorenzini (see[22] Proposition 1.1) implies that if E/Q is an elliptic curve with a Q-rational point of order 9, then 9 2 divides…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%