1971
DOI: 10.2140/pjm.1971.37.225
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torsion theories and rings of quotients of Morita equivalent rings

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

1973
1973
2001
2001

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 11 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Luedeman remarks that the method of Utumi for ordinary injectivity does not readily generalize; however that of Kaye [3] does. More generally Turnidge [6] has studied the connections between idempotent topologizing families in Morita equivalent rings. If G\ R JK-+ S J% and H\ s J(-> R Jt are functors giving a category equivalence, there is a pairing between the hereditary torsion theories [6] in R <J( and $J£ and, hence, between the idempotent topologizing families of left ideals.…”
Section: Proof We Remark First That Z Zg (Mg)=z Z (M)gmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Luedeman remarks that the method of Utumi for ordinary injectivity does not readily generalize; however that of Kaye [3] does. More generally Turnidge [6] has studied the connections between idempotent topologizing families in Morita equivalent rings. If G\ R JK-+ S J% and H\ s J(-> R Jt are functors giving a category equivalence, there is a pairing between the hereditary torsion theories [6] in R <J( and $J£ and, hence, between the idempotent topologizing families of left ideals.…”
Section: Proof We Remark First That Z Zg (Mg)=z Z (M)gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More generally Turnidge [6] has studied the connections between idempotent topologizing families in Morita equivalent rings. If G\ R JK-+ S J% and H\ s J(-> R Jt are functors giving a category equivalence, there is a pairing between the hereditary torsion theories [6] in R <J( and $J£ and, hence, between the idempotent topologizing families of left ideals. Let ^(R) be a torsion theory in R J( then the pairing is given by corresponding to ^(R) the torsion class $~{S)= {Me 8 J£ | H(M) e3T(R)}.…”
Section: Proof We Remark First That Z Zg (Mg)=z Z (M)gmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See Gabriel [6] and the Walkers [13].) The ring of quotients of the integers Z with respect to the strongly complete Serre class of torsion abelian groups is the field of rationals Q and the kernel of the mapping rjG: G->Q ®zG defined by i)a(g) = l®g is the torsion subgroup T(G) of G. In general if (3, fJ) is a torsion theory for sSJi, the kernel of the mapping [January rjM: M-*Q3®rM defined by r]M(m) = 1 ®m is contained in the torsion submodule T(M) of M. (See [12,Proposition l.l].) It can be shown that whenever ker rjM = T(M) for every left P-module M the ring Q3 is flat as a right P-module.…”
Section: With T(m)e3 and M/t(m)eandmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(See [12,Theorem 1.4].) For example given any left Ore ring R, the ring of left quotients of R with respect to the torsion theory studied by Levy is the classical ring of left quotients of R which is flat as a right P-module.…”
Section: With T(m)e3 and M/t(m)eandmentioning
confidence: 99%