2008
DOI: 10.1017/s0013091505000039
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Torsion Units in Integral Group Rings of Certain Metabelian Groups

Abstract: It is shown that any torsion unit of the integral group ring ZG of a finite group G is rationally conjugate to an element of ±G if G = XA with A a cyclic normal subgroup of G and X an abelian group (thus confirming a conjecture of Zassenhaus for this particular class of groups, which comprises the class of metacyclic groups).

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
30
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 29 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
0
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Also some related properties and some weakened variations of the Zassenhaus conjecture as well can be found in [1,22] and [3,20]. For some recent results we refer to [5,7,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introduction Conjectures and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…Also some related properties and some weakened variations of the Zassenhaus conjecture as well can be found in [1,22] and [3,20]. For some recent results we refer to [5,7,15,16,17,18].…”
Section: Introduction Conjectures and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 94%
“…The same method has also proved to be useful for some groups containing non-trivial normal subgroups. For some recent results we refer to [5,7,14,16,15,17]. Some related properties and weakened variations of the Zassenhaus conjecture can be found in [1,3,19].…”
Section: Introduction Conjectures and Main Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the group G possesses elements of orders 2, 3, 4, 5, 6,7,8,10,12,13,14,15,16,20,24,26, and 29, first of all we investigate units of some of these orders (except the units of orders 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 14, 15, 16, 20, 24, and 26 ). After this, by Proposition 4, the order of each torsion unit divides the exponent of G, so to prove the Kimmerle conjecture it remains to consider units of orders 21, 35, 39, 58, 65, 87, 91, 145, 203, and 377.…”
Section: Proof Of Theoremmentioning
confidence: 99%