Search citation statements
Paper Sections
Citation Types
Year Published
Publication Types
Relationship
Authors
Journals
Purpose of Review To describe how general prescriptions to protect temperate and boreal forests against pests have been affecting the conservation of insect diversity, (2) to identify potential conflicts between biodiversity conservation actions and pest control, and (3) to provide future directions to reconcile forest pest management with insect conservation. Recent Findings Despite dealing with the same habitats and organisms, forest pest management and insect conservation have been separate disciplines, often pursuing conflicting goals. However, there is a large intersection between the two, as interventions to control pests can have repercussions on biodiversity and vice versa. In several regions, forest pest management is shifting from reactive measures to contain on-going outbreaks to proactive strategies to create forest landscapes that are more resistant and resilient against pests in the long-term. These developments suggest a possible convergence between pest management and insect conservation objectives. Summary Several reactive measures adopted to control pests can cause negative impacts on non-target insects, although effects are sometimes localized and often context-dependent. Following ecological, economic, and social considerations, pest management has been evolving towards diversifying forests across multiple spatial scales to reduce the severity of outbreaks and the risk of damage. Such strategies concur with multiple conservation goals to increase insect diversity across intensive forest landscapes. Insect conservation has traditionally targeted saproxylic organisms, neglecting the conservation of other insect guilds and seldom assessing side effects on pests. Despite some important knowledge gaps, we propose complementary approaches to combine multiple diversification strategies at the landscape scale to reconcile pest management with insect conservation.
Purpose of Review To describe how general prescriptions to protect temperate and boreal forests against pests have been affecting the conservation of insect diversity, (2) to identify potential conflicts between biodiversity conservation actions and pest control, and (3) to provide future directions to reconcile forest pest management with insect conservation. Recent Findings Despite dealing with the same habitats and organisms, forest pest management and insect conservation have been separate disciplines, often pursuing conflicting goals. However, there is a large intersection between the two, as interventions to control pests can have repercussions on biodiversity and vice versa. In several regions, forest pest management is shifting from reactive measures to contain on-going outbreaks to proactive strategies to create forest landscapes that are more resistant and resilient against pests in the long-term. These developments suggest a possible convergence between pest management and insect conservation objectives. Summary Several reactive measures adopted to control pests can cause negative impacts on non-target insects, although effects are sometimes localized and often context-dependent. Following ecological, economic, and social considerations, pest management has been evolving towards diversifying forests across multiple spatial scales to reduce the severity of outbreaks and the risk of damage. Such strategies concur with multiple conservation goals to increase insect diversity across intensive forest landscapes. Insect conservation has traditionally targeted saproxylic organisms, neglecting the conservation of other insect guilds and seldom assessing side effects on pests. Despite some important knowledge gaps, we propose complementary approaches to combine multiple diversification strategies at the landscape scale to reconcile pest management with insect conservation.
One of the most prominent problems related to biological invasions is the variation of local species composition, which often leads to ex novo interspecific interactions. Here, we explored and analysed the native species composition of gall inducers and their associated parasitoids and inquilines in Spanish areas invaded by Dryocosmus kuriphilus Yasumatsu 1951 (Hymenoptera: Cynipidae), an invasive pest of chestnut trees. After a quantitative description of these species' assemblages, we analysed through bipartite networks the level of the trophic specialisation of parasitoids and inquilines when considering either the host taxonomic identity, the host plant species or the host gall morphological type. We sampled galls of D. kuriphilus and native species of Cynipidae in different Spanish areas, including those where the exotic parasitoid Torymus sinensis Kamijo 1982 (Hymenoptera: Torymidae) had been released for D. kuriphilus biological control. The results indicate that the native parasitoids recruited by D. kuriphilus come almost exclusively from native communities on Quercus galls, except for one species from Rosa. Galls of D. kuriphilus had the second most diverse species composition; despite this species assemblage arose ex novo in less than a decade. The bipartite networks resulted more specialised when considering host plant taxa than when gall types and the host taxa were accounted. In such trophic webs, there were few parasitoid/inquiline specialist and many generalist species, which agrees with the rapid recruitment by D. kuriphilus. Higher parasitoid species richness in D. kuriphilus galls is likely due to their being a largely unexploited available resource for the native natural enemies of cynipid wasps.
Biological invasions have become a major threat to all agro-ecosystems. Estimating the bottom-up and top-down forces controlling the spread of invasive insects is a key challenge to lessen their burden on crops, forestry, and biodiversity. We combined ecological, metabarcoding and population genomics analyses with an integrative modelling of the invasion of a global insect pest to identify the impacts of its chestnut tree resource, natural enemies and biological control agent in Eastern Pyrenees. The host tree frequency and genomic variation associated with common resistance pathways had effects 4-10 times greater than the native hyperparasite community on the pest's invasion potential (R0). The greater than 90% field rates of hyperparasitism by the control agent and the associated 80% reduction in pest infestation are likely to be deceptive as our modelling consistently predicts their long-term coexistence with periodic re-emergences. Such a persistent co-invasion scenario calls for a thorough assessment of the impact of these global pest and control agent on natural forest ecosystems.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.
customersupport@researchsolutions.com
10624 S. Eastern Ave., Ste. A-614
Henderson, NV 89052, USA
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Copyright © 2025 scite LLC. All rights reserved.
Made with 💙 for researchers
Part of the Research Solutions Family.