2023
DOI: 10.1002/lom3.10549
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total alkalinity measurement using an open‐source platform

Daniel E. Sandborn,
Elizabeth C. Minor,
Craig Hill

Abstract: Total alkalinity is a pivotal water quality parameter dictating the response of natural waters to acid–base system perturbations such as ocean acidification and acid mine drainage. Its value as a biogeochemical and ecological variable is enhanced not just by high measurement quality, but also by measurement accessibility. This research demonstrates an instrument that advances the accessibility of high‐precision, high‐accuracy total alkalinity measurement using open‐source, and low‐cost instrumentation. Repeate… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

1
0

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(4 citation statements)
references
References 54 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Seasonal variation in DIC was evident as a summertime decrease on the order of 20 μmol kg 1 , followed by an autumn increase of c. 10 μmol kg 1 . The pH free distribution fell within the range of values given in Minor and Brinkley (2022), while the mean calculated DIC was 10-40 μmol kg 1 higher than observations given in Zigah et al (2011) and Sandborn et al (2023). The discrepancy may be due to interannual DIC increases, sampling bias in the latter two studies favoring regions or periods of lower DIC, contribution of organic alkalinity, uncertainty associated with equilibrium calculation, or error propagated from uncertainty in A T .…”
Section: Underway Timeseries Overviewmentioning
confidence: 53%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…Seasonal variation in DIC was evident as a summertime decrease on the order of 20 μmol kg 1 , followed by an autumn increase of c. 10 μmol kg 1 . The pH free distribution fell within the range of values given in Minor and Brinkley (2022), while the mean calculated DIC was 10-40 μmol kg 1 higher than observations given in Zigah et al (2011) and Sandborn et al (2023). The discrepancy may be due to interannual DIC increases, sampling bias in the latter two studies favoring regions or periods of lower DIC, contribution of organic alkalinity, uncertainty associated with equilibrium calculation, or error propagated from uncertainty in A T .…”
Section: Underway Timeseries Overviewmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…(2011) and Sandborn et al. (2023). The discrepancy may be due to interannual DIC increases, sampling bias in the latter two studies favoring regions or periods of lower DIC, contribution of organic alkalinity, uncertainty associated with equilibrium calculation, or error propagated from uncertainty in A T .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 2 more Smart Citations