Although total communication is a major comin their classrooms. As a result, there is much munication approach used in the education of inconsistency in the signing behavior of teachers. deaf students, the field has not undertaken to critiIn this paper, it is suggested that new policies that cally examine the role or the impact of using signs.stress the explicit roles of sign communication and Furthermore, teachers have received little prepalanguage are needed for total communication proration in the use of various types of signing and, grams. Initially, a brief overview of selected for the most part, are able to dictate how they sign research is given.Since the term total communication was coined in the late 1960s by Roy Holcomb (Clarke, 1972), it has been defined in various ways. Denton (1972) stated that total communication is the right of a deaf child to learn to use all forms of communication to facilitate the development of language. Moores (1987) outlined the practice of total communication as consisting of the use of speechreading, amplification, signs, and flngerspelling to provide linguistic input to deaf students, while the students are able to use whatever modality(ies) in which they are best able to express themselves. Stewart (1982) summarized various philosophical and methodological positions on total communication as follows:In theory, it reflects an attitude embraced by teachers, parents and children to allow them to use any available means of communication to express a thought. Thus, it is a philosophy that urges not how one communicates but that one communicates effectively. In practice, total communication calls for parents and teachers to develop their skills, and those of a child, to utilize various abilities of transmitting and receiving information, (p. 139)In each of these definitions, there is a lack of specificity as to how various modalities are to be used for instructional and other discourse purposes in the classroom and how language type will affect total communication processes. Predictably, lack of clarity in the implementation of total communication has led to equally unclear and misguided practices in the field. Two decades ago, however, the logistics of implementing a total communication approach was not central to the support that total communication received. This support stemmed mainly from disenfranchisement over the lack of success that oral-aural communication methodologies were having in the education of deaf children. The use of signs espoused in the total communication approach Address: