1974
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(74)90551-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total cross sections for some (α, n) and (α, p) reactions in medium-weight nuclei

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

6
34
0

Year Published

1976
1976
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
6
34
0
Order By: Relevance
“…11). The same has been proved [13] to be true also for an enlarged systematics [78,79,80,81,82,85,86] discussed recently [23], and several data sets [83,87] lastly taken into account. The related incident-energy range can hardly explain the difference with respect to the same comparison just above A=60 (Fig.…”
Section: A≤54 Target Nucleisupporting
confidence: 60%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…11). The same has been proved [13] to be true also for an enlarged systematics [78,79,80,81,82,85,86] discussed recently [23], and several data sets [83,87] lastly taken into account. The related incident-energy range can hardly explain the difference with respect to the same comparison just above A=60 (Fig.…”
Section: A≤54 Target Nucleisupporting
confidence: 60%
“…Table 1 The experimental data of α-particle elastic scattering analysed in this work. where: [73] Figure captions Table 1) angular distributions of the elastic scattering of α-particles at 25 MeV on 51 V, 53 Cr, 56,58 Fe, 59 Co, 63 Cu, 70,74,76 Ge, 76,78,80 Se, 94 Mo, 107 Ag and 112,124 Sn, divided by the Rutherford cross section, with OMP calculations by using either the present local parameter sets of Table 2 (solid curves), the regional parameter set in Table 3 (dash-dotted curves), or the global OMP parameter set of Kumar et al [23] (dotted curves). 9.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Earlier data by Vlieks et al [55] are slightly higher especially at energies above 9 MeV. Recent stackedfoil data by Peng et al [11] and Chowdhury et al [12] are in good agreement with the other data whereas earlier stacked-foil data [59,60,61,62,63,64] deviate significantly at the lowest energies.…”
Section: Vmentioning
confidence: 56%
“…Only at the lowest energies below about 5 MeV the (α,p) cross section becomes comparable to the (α,n) cross section whereas at higher energies the (α,p) reaction contributes by less than 20 % [57]. The data points at the lowest energies for the (α,p) reaction in [58] [55,57,58,11,12] are shown. The agreement between the experimental (α,n) data and the calculated total reaction cross section σ reac and reduced cross section σ red is excellent up to E red ≈ 1.5 MeV.…”
Section: Vmentioning
confidence: 99%