Total cross sections of hadron interactions at high energies in a model with low number of constituents

Experimental evidences of difference in $pp$ and $p\bar{p}$ interactions at high energies

“…But we can use this approach to analyze possible inequality in Ed 3 σ pp /dp 3 and Ed 3 σ pp /dp 3 . We are based on the Low Constituents Number Model (LCNM) [11,12]. As it should be in any collision theory, the model contains three stages: preparation of initial state, interaction, and separation of reaction products.…”

“…When the charges are separated by distance larger than the confinement radius, color electric 2 This assumption allows to explain small value of the Pomeranchuk trajectory slope [11]. It also allows to describe value and growth with energy of pp, pp, π ± p, K ± p total cross sections [12].…”

Comparison of the data on proton-proton and proton-antiproton interactions at high energies on basis of the Low Constituents Number Model

“…In this region the value of P n is about one order of magnitude smaller than in the maximum region and so it is hard to experimentally study it because of large uncertainties. Therefore the difference in P n distributions in pp and pp value and growth with energy of pp, pp, π ± p, K ± p total cross sections [12]. 3 This argument is quite plausible, but it demands theoretical justification.…”

“…But we can use this approach to analyze possible inequality in Ed 3 σ pp /dp 3 and Ed 3 σ pp /dp 3 . We are based on the Low Constituents Number Model (LCNM) [11,12]. As it should be in any collision theory, the model contains three stages: preparation of initial state, interaction, and separation of reaction products.…”