1994
DOI: 10.1006/jfca.1994.1004
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Dietary Fiber Content of Selected Nuts by Two Enzymatic–Gravimetric Methods

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
6
2

Year Published

1998
1998
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
1
6
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Lintas and Cappelloni (14) reported TDF values of 10.9% (w/w) for peanuts using AOAC Method 985.29 (5). However, other methods such as AOAC Method 991.43 (5) may result in lower values than those reported in this study (15).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…Lintas and Cappelloni (14) reported TDF values of 10.9% (w/w) for peanuts using AOAC Method 985.29 (5). However, other methods such as AOAC Method 991.43 (5) may result in lower values than those reported in this study (15).…”
Section: Resultscontrasting
confidence: 61%
“…However, comparison of the proximate composition of all GMP lines with that of the parent line does not indicate any trend that such a relatively small variation might be due to the genetic modifications. Such compositional variations are very common among plants and natural materials even if they come from the same variety (Cardozo and Li 1994). The ash contents of all GMP lines and the parent line were similar and were about 2%.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Lintas and Cappelloni (1992) used enzymatic-gravimetric methods and found 14.4 g insoluble dietary fiber and 0.78 g soluble dietary fiber (15.2 g TDF) per 100 g of blended almond samples (no cultivar identified). Cardozo and Li (1994) compared the TDF values obtained by two enzymatic-gravimetric methods for various nuts, including commercial brands of almonds from California. For almonds, the mean TDF values obtained were slightly lower with the simplified enzymatic-gravimetric method than with the modified version of the standard AOAC Method 985.29.…”
Section: Dietary Fibermentioning
confidence: 99%