2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.06.251
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total En Bloc Spondylectomy for Solitary Metastatic Tumors of the Fourth Lumbar Spine in a Posterior-Only Approach

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
2

Year Published

2019
2019
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7
1
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
15
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Because the anatomical structure of the spine is complex, radical spinal oncology resection for spinal neoplasms is nearly impossible [22,23]. Although piecemeal or intralesional excisions may yield the complete resection of tumors, these procedures are associated with a high risk of local recurrence due to tumor contamination and residual tumors [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the anatomical structure of the spine is complex, radical spinal oncology resection for spinal neoplasms is nearly impossible [22,23]. Although piecemeal or intralesional excisions may yield the complete resection of tumors, these procedures are associated with a high risk of local recurrence due to tumor contamination and residual tumors [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because the anatomical structure of the spine is complex, radical spinal oncology resection for spinal neoplasms is nearly impossible [18,19]. Although piecemeal or intralesional excisions may yield the complete resection of tumors, these procedures are associated with a high risk of local recurrence due to tumor contamination and residual tumors [20].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Presently, total en bloc spondylectomy (TES) has been increasingly recognized, and widely accepted for the treatment of specific spine tumors and has better tumor control than piecemeal and subtotal resection. 38 , 39 In our series, the resection mode included total en bloc spondylectomy, total piecemeal spondylectomy and debulking or subtotal resection, which technique to use was mainly based on the Tomita classification and WBB staging. The final statistical results revealed that TES resulted in better OS than those treated with piecemeal and subtotal mode (p=0.029, 95% CI 1.136–6.421, Figure 6 ).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%