2021
DOI: 10.1038/s41430-021-00885-7
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total energy expenditure among children with motor, intellectual, visual, and hearing disabilities: a doubly labeled water method

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Of the included studies, 260 (96%) had <100 participants, whereas 253 (93%) had <50 participants. Only 7 disease categories had participant cohorts >100: cystic fibrosis ( n = 236 [ 23 ]; n = 134 [ 24 ]); developmental disability ( n = 256 [ 25 ]); eating disorders ( n = 181 [ 26 ]); endocrine ( n = 292 [ 27 ]); neurological conditions ( n = 236 [ 23 ]; n = 131 [ 28 ]); neuromuscular disease ( n = 122 [ 22 ]); and other, mixed, and unstratified cohort ( n = 236 [ 23 ]; n = 398 [ 29 ]). Age of participants ranged from birth to 18 y.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Of the included studies, 260 (96%) had <100 participants, whereas 253 (93%) had <50 participants. Only 7 disease categories had participant cohorts >100: cystic fibrosis ( n = 236 [ 23 ]; n = 134 [ 24 ]); developmental disability ( n = 256 [ 25 ]); eating disorders ( n = 181 [ 26 ]); endocrine ( n = 292 [ 27 ]); neurological conditions ( n = 236 [ 23 ]; n = 131 [ 28 ]); neuromuscular disease ( n = 122 [ 22 ]); and other, mixed, and unstratified cohort ( n = 236 [ 23 ]; n = 398 [ 29 ]). Age of participants ranged from birth to 18 y.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intervention studies in the IDD population, besides being limited, have different approaches and lack meta-analysis studies to identify which exercise prescription has the greatest effects on the variables assessed A possible justification for the lack of significant differences in the remaining variables of body composition may be due to the fact that variables such as diet/calorie intake were not controlled in the present study, although being known that the average value of calories intake is higher in the IDD population ( Hoey et al, 2017 ). Also, individuals with IDD (namely, Down Syndrome) have been shown to have total energy expenditure values lower than those without disability ( Polfuss et al, 2018 ; Ohwada et al, 2021 ), which negatively affects the ratio of caloric intake to energy expended ( Polfuss et al, 2018 ). Future approaches should take the balance of calorie intake (nutrition) and energy expenditure (physical activity and basal metabolism) into consideration, in the sense that intake should not exceed expenditure.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For example, the root-mean-squared error between the measured REE using indirect calorimetry and predicted REE from the Harris-Benedict equation was 185.2 kcal/day in patients with SMID aged over 18 years [19]. The doubly labeled water method, a gold standard for measuring total energy expenditure (TEE), revealed that the TEE was lowest in children aged 6-15 years with motor disabilities [20]. In this study, the mean daily energy and protein intakes were 24 kcal/kg/actual BW/day and 1.1 g/kg/actual BW/day, respectively.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%