2012
DOI: 10.1136/bmj.e2147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total hip arthroplasty versus resurfacing arthroplasty in the treatment of patients with arthritis of the hip joint: single centre, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial

Abstract: Objectives To compare the clinical and cost effectiveness of total hip arthroplasty with resurfacing arthroplasty in patients with severe arthritis of the hip.Design Single centre, two arm, parallel group, assessor blinded, randomised controlled trial with 1:1 treatment allocation.Setting One large teaching hospital in the United Kingdom.Participants 126 patients older than 18 years with severe arthritis of the hip joint, suitable for resurfacing arthroplasty of the hip. Patients were excluded if they were con… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

9
64
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(73 citation statements)
references
References 28 publications
9
64
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These outcomes support and underscore recent reports on WOMAC scores [25,38,39,41,57,59,69,70] and Oxford Hip Scores [31,36,[56][57][58] from other authors and patient populations. Our SF-12 results are in agreement with published SF-12 and SF-36 outcomes, which demonstrate restoration of generic QoL approaching that of the normal population [16,41,56,58] (Table 4). Until recently, most reports focused on implant survivorship and did not consistently include validated patient-reported outcome measures that refer to QoL or other dimensions of patientperceived results of surgery, such as patient satisfaction and activity [16,41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…These outcomes support and underscore recent reports on WOMAC scores [25,38,39,41,57,59,69,70] and Oxford Hip Scores [31,36,[56][57][58] from other authors and patient populations. Our SF-12 results are in agreement with published SF-12 and SF-36 outcomes, which demonstrate restoration of generic QoL approaching that of the normal population [16,41,56,58] (Table 4). Until recently, most reports focused on implant survivorship and did not consistently include validated patient-reported outcome measures that refer to QoL or other dimensions of patientperceived results of surgery, such as patient satisfaction and activity [16,41].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
“…Our SF-12 results are in agreement with published SF-12 and SF-36 outcomes, which demonstrate restoration of generic QoL approaching that of the normal population [16,41,56,58] (Table 4). Until recently, most reports focused on implant survivorship and did not consistently include validated patient-reported outcome measures that refer to QoL or other dimensions of patientperceived results of surgery, such as patient satisfaction and activity [16,41]. Patient perception of the results of surgery and patient preferences are an increasingly important component of patient-informed and shared decision making in elective surgical procedures [13].…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 82%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…A change 7 to 10 points has been suggested to show a minimum clinically important difference in hip scores [3,12]. We chose a value of 5 to improve the robustness of the analyses.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Three recent prospective randomised controlled trials have failed to detect a difference between HRA and total hip arthroplasty (THA). All were only powered to detect a 10 % difference in slow walking speeds or used conventional functional scores, which have well documented ceiling effects [4][5][6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%