2008
DOI: 10.2106/jbjs.g.00147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total Hip Replacement in Patients Eighty Years of Age and Older

Abstract: In patients who had a total hip arthroplasty when they were more than eighty years old, the prevalence of aseptic loosening was less than that encountered in younger patients, but recurrent dislocation, periprosthetic fracture, and infection were more common in this age group. Cementation of the femoral stem demonstrated better long-term results than cementless fixation, indicating that it may provide better initial fixation and, therefore, longer life-in-service.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

4
31
0
4

Year Published

2010
2010
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
4

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 71 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 12 publications
4
31
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…8,9 Because of these risks, surgeons may be apprehensive to perform elective surgeries on an otherwise healthy octogenarian, despite several successful reports of high survivorship of THA in this older population. 10,11,6 We therefore wanted to evaluate the survivorship of proximally coated cementless tapered stems in patients who were over 80 years of age and to specifically assess the peri-and postoperative complication rates. The infrequency of these complications, coupled with low revision and dislocation rates, and radiographic evidence of stable components, suggest the safety and efficacy of this procedure in patients over 80 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…8,9 Because of these risks, surgeons may be apprehensive to perform elective surgeries on an otherwise healthy octogenarian, despite several successful reports of high survivorship of THA in this older population. 10,11,6 We therefore wanted to evaluate the survivorship of proximally coated cementless tapered stems in patients who were over 80 years of age and to specifically assess the peri-and postoperative complication rates. The infrequency of these complications, coupled with low revision and dislocation rates, and radiographic evidence of stable components, suggest the safety and efficacy of this procedure in patients over 80 years of age.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Older patients constitute an exception because less biomechanical stress on the revision prosthesis can be expected [24]. The survival rate of cemented prostheses with a long shaft in patients with an average age of 62.3 years was rather short after initially good functional Table 1 Frequency of occurrence according to type of defect [1] results (54% after 12 years) according to Diekerhof et al [25].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Both primary and revision THAs and TKAs have become more common in older and sicker patients with patients 80 years of age and older demonstrating high rates of improved function, pain relief, and patient satisfaction by standardized measures as well as prosthesis survival [1-4, 9, 19, 20, 25-27, 29, 34]. A recent study of 6989 THAs in patients 80 years of age and older from the Finnish National Registry reported an overall revision rate of 2.8% and prosthesis survivorship of 94% at 10 years [25].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%