1967
DOI: 10.1016/0375-9474(67)90228-x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total neutron cross sections of isotopes and the isobaric spin term of the nuclear potential

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

1
3
0

Year Published

1967
1967
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 27 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
1
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our new data are in good agreement with the previous measurements where available. In the cases of the rare isotopes 64 Ni and 112 Sn, data were available at only one energy, 14.1 MeV, from a study from more than 50 years ago [34] and our measurement is in excellent agreement, within 2-3%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Our new data are in good agreement with the previous measurements where available. In the cases of the rare isotopes 64 Ni and 112 Sn, data were available at only one energy, 14.1 MeV, from a study from more than 50 years ago [34] and our measurement is in excellent agreement, within 2-3%.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 56%
“…FIG.9: Neutron σtot for16,18 O,58,64 Ni, and 112,124 Sn: our results and literature data. In the upper three panels, our digitizermeasured isotopic results are shown in red and corresponding analog-measured literature data[8,34,[36][37][38][39][40][41][42] are shown in blue. The data for18 O have been shifted up by 1 barn for visibility.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In Fig. 2, for example, it is seen that the '"Nd fit is not as good as the Sm fit from 1 to 5 MeV. This discrepancy probably contributes to the poor quality of the fits over the same energy range for the Nd relative differences shown in Fig.…”
Section: Andmentioning
confidence: 89%
“…The data presented in Figs. 5 and 8 show that, in this mass region, neutron total cross sections change in a systematic way when either two neutrons or two protons are added to a nucleus. This behavior probably is a consequence of regular changes in size and/or deformation with neutron or proton number and strongly suggests the possibility of determining unknown neutron total cross sections with reasonable precision simply by the method of extrapolation from known ones (provided, of course, that the difference in A is small).…”
Section: Andmentioning
confidence: 94%