Urinary and fecal incontinence, obstructed defecation, pelvic pain and pelvic organ prolapse are common in older multiparous women, affecting approximately 16% of females aged 40-56 years [1]. As we evaluate a patient with a clinically evident anatomic defect (rectocele, rectal prolapse, perineal descent), it is essential to establish whether this defect is really associated with the patient's symptoms (obstructed defecation). Moreover, a pelvic floor disorder in one compartment frequently coexists with disorders involving other compartments. Indeed, rather than considering the pelvic floor as divided into three vertical compartments, the current concept is to approach the pelvic floor as a horizontal structure [1]. The pelvic floor is a three-dimensional mechanical apparatus that acts as a unit, with a close interrelationship between organ systems, fascia and ligaments, muscles, vessels and nerves. Because the levator ani muscle provides support to all three organ systems, its weakness will result in impaired function of any, or all, of the structures that the muscle supports. In addition, damage to the endopelvic, pubocervical or rectovaginal fascias will lead to herniation of one organ system into another. This is demonstrated by the common coexistence of prolapse of the anterior and posterior vaginal walls requiring repair of both. Understanding pelvic floor anatomy is therefore crucial for an effective management of these dysfunctions.A careful preoperative evaluation is key to determining the pathophysiology of pelvic floor dysfunction [2]. Clinical examination, however, is not accurate in diagnosing anatomical defects of the posterior vaginal wall, overestimating the presence of rectocele (large false-positive rate) but missing enterocele or intussusception in patients with primary pelvic organ prolapse (large false-negative rate) [3,4]. Imaging allows the clinician to better evaluate the patients in order to determine what anatomical alterations are present, and this leads to appropriate surgical interventions and increased success rates [5]. Traditional evacuation proctography or colpocystoproctography, modern dynamic magnetic resonance imaging and ultrasound can be used for visualization of the pelvic floor [5]. Advantages of ultrasound over the other imaging modalities are that it is more widely available, more cost-effective, less time-consuming, and associated with better patient compliance. It is performed by the clinician during office consultation and can be considered as an extension of the physical examination. The development of new technological innovations such as three-/four-dimensional (3D/4D) tools, video-recording, post-processing analysis and the standardization of methodology and terminology [6] have made ultrasound imaging more reproducible and less operator dependent.Several ultrasound techniques can be used to assess the pelvic floor [6]. Translabial ultrasound (TLUS) is performed with the patient placed in the dorsal lithotomy position, with hips flexed and abducted, by using a con...