1994
DOI: 10.2172/145216
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Total-system performance assessment for Yucca Mountain - SNL second iteration (TSPA-1993); Volume 2

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

1995
1995
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus uncertainty in the fracture aperture distribution was constrained by adjusting the limits of fracture aperture distribution to minimum and maximum values of 1 Â 10 À6 and 1.5 mm, respectively, while matching measured fracture domain permeability given in Table 1. The mean value of the fracture aperture distribution shown in Table 1 is 0.031 mm, which is slightly smaller than the hydraulic aperture estimated by Wilson et al [1993] and CRWMS M&O [2000]. Model calculations reveal that under unsaturated conditions the results were not sensitive to upper and lower bounds of aperture size distribution (other than the expected impact on permeability at saturation of larger apertures).…”
Section: Comparisons With Previous Models and Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 63%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Thus uncertainty in the fracture aperture distribution was constrained by adjusting the limits of fracture aperture distribution to minimum and maximum values of 1 Â 10 À6 and 1.5 mm, respectively, while matching measured fracture domain permeability given in Table 1. The mean value of the fracture aperture distribution shown in Table 1 is 0.031 mm, which is slightly smaller than the hydraulic aperture estimated by Wilson et al [1993] and CRWMS M&O [2000]. Model calculations reveal that under unsaturated conditions the results were not sensitive to upper and lower bounds of aperture size distribution (other than the expected impact on permeability at saturation of larger apertures).…”
Section: Comparisons With Previous Models and Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 63%
“…For the first type, Barton et al [1993] measured representative mechanical apertures for many fractures on cleared pavements; however, these fractures likely include the effects of surficial processes. For the second type of aperture data, Wilson et al [1993] used borehole fracture spacing and air permeability data combined with the cubic law for flow in a fracture plane to generate Monte Carlo realizations of hydraulic aperture distributions following the beta function. They used minimum and maximum hydraulic apertures of 0.064 and 1.14 mm, and estimated a mean hydraulic aperture of 0.18 mm.…”
Section: Comparisons With Previous Models and Sensitivity Analysesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…flux[Wilson et al, 1994;Pruess et al, 1997]. The water flux in fractures is considered to be mainly dependent on fracture saturation because fracture water flow is gravitydominated.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As mentioned above, the total area of the repository is currently estimated to be about 6 km 2. The area radioactive waste occupies within repository depends on design but varies from about 2.3 km 2 for a high thermal load repository to 4.6 km 2 for a lower thermal load repository [Wilson et al, 1994]. Our calculations have been for 8 km2, which includes the total area of the repository and a buffer zone extending 500 m out from the repository perimeter.…”
Section: Probability Of Volcanic Disruption Of the Proposed Yucca Moumentioning
confidence: 99%