2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.tafmec.2020.102662
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Toughness evaluation of poly(butylene terephthalate) nanocomposites

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
10
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 62 publications
2
10
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The elongation at break of PBT/MBClay nanocomposites was smaller than that of neat PBT, likely due to the presence of agglomerated and intercalated MBClay layers in the PBT matrix. Similar tensile behaviors were reported by other studies [24,26,41,46].…”
Section: Tensile Testsupporting
confidence: 91%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The elongation at break of PBT/MBClay nanocomposites was smaller than that of neat PBT, likely due to the presence of agglomerated and intercalated MBClay layers in the PBT matrix. Similar tensile behaviors were reported by other studies [24,26,41,46].…”
Section: Tensile Testsupporting
confidence: 91%
“…Although PBT has good mechanical properties and thermal stability, these are still insufficient for its potential applications in a wide range of industrial fields. Thus, the incorporation of different fillers in micro and nano-size into PBT has been evaluated in order to develop high-performance PBT composite materials applicable for advanced industries [26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41]. Additionally, the incorporation of only a small amount of clay, into PBT can increase the low impact strength and heat distortion temperature, and reduce the brittleness and cost, widening the field of applicability of this polyester [24,25,30].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The higher mechanical strength upon nanofiller inclusion can be ascribed to the high dispersion levels of nanoparticles and improved polymer‐filler interfacial adhesion, which inhibited crack coalescence in the polymer, increased the polymer‐filler load transfer, and consequently led to a higher load‐bearing capacity. [ 62 ] As evident from Figure 9A, the inclusion of CaCO 3 further improved the tensile and flexural strength by 7% and 17%, respectively, when compared to POM/CB. The substantial increment in mechanical strength for the ternary nanocomposites, as compared to POM/CB, reflects the contributing effects of two nanoparticles, in terms of homogenous distribution, when applied into a single polymeric matrix.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…[ 23,58 ] CaCO 3 was mainly utilized as a toughening agent in different thermoplastics, which enhanced the thermal, mechanical, and tribological performance of hosting matrices. [ 59–62 ] A synergetic improvement in stiffness and toughness with the inclusion of NCC into POM was observed, ascribed to a proper particle‐matrix bonding. [ 63 ] The surface modification of CaCO 3 using a fatty acid also contributes to lowering the surface energy and better disperse the nanoparticles in the polymer.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Also, it can be obviously seen that, owing to unstable crack growth, a smooth fractured surface is prevalent in this specimen which has been reported before. 29 In order to escalate PBT toughness, PBT was blended with TPU. Figure 4 illustrates the SEM images of fractured surfaces of blends containing 10, 20, and 30 wt.% of TPU elastomeric phase, respectively.…”
Section: Morphology Observationmentioning
confidence: 99%