Tourism and the Less Developed World: Issues and Case Studies 2001
DOI: 10.1079/9780851994338.0023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tourism and less developed countries: key issues.

Abstract: This chapter focuses on key features of the role of international tourism in the wider development process. Other research areas are closely linked to the topics raised, and that the end of the discussion suggestions are given as to how they might be situated in the wider framework proposed. However, it is argued here, first, that tourism is a crucial feature of a much wider process of migration; secondly, that it is strongly associated with the expansion of capitalism; and thirdly, that of all the major facto… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0
3

Year Published

2001
2001
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 42 publications
(42 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…Part of the problem (with regard to the critique of 'structuralist theorizing' amongst advocates of the 'critical turn') lies in the limited legacy of studies that drew on neoMarxist theories of dependency, a paradigm which has received substantial critique -much of it warranted -in the tourism literature (see Harrison 2001;Bianchi 2002) as well as the development studies literature as a whole (see Booth 1985;Kiely 1995). Furthermore, the preponderance of research carried out in peripheral or 'less developed' parts of the world, may perhaps lead scholars to underplay the extent of linkages that do in fact exist to international capital and transnational corporate actors, as Duffy (2002; illustrates with respect to eco-tourism in Belize and Madagascar.…”
Section: The 'Essentialist' Sins Of Structuralist Analyses?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Part of the problem (with regard to the critique of 'structuralist theorizing' amongst advocates of the 'critical turn') lies in the limited legacy of studies that drew on neoMarxist theories of dependency, a paradigm which has received substantial critique -much of it warranted -in the tourism literature (see Harrison 2001;Bianchi 2002) as well as the development studies literature as a whole (see Booth 1985;Kiely 1995). Furthermore, the preponderance of research carried out in peripheral or 'less developed' parts of the world, may perhaps lead scholars to underplay the extent of linkages that do in fact exist to international capital and transnational corporate actors, as Duffy (2002; illustrates with respect to eco-tourism in Belize and Madagascar.…”
Section: The 'Essentialist' Sins Of Structuralist Analyses?mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The administrative decentralization trend in China's tourism after the late-1980s (Oakes, 1998;Wen & Tisdell, 2001;Zhang, 2003) enables local authorities and entrepreneurs to be more independent in the operation of the industry regarding the issues of investment, infrastructure construction, and the plural formats of tourism development in different regions (Xu, 1999). However, what occurs in most developing countries is that the state practices its macro-control power through direct or managerial or developmental involvement in the industry (Jenkins & Henry, 1982;Harrison, 2001;Timothy, 1999;Timothy & Tosun, 2003;Tosun, 2000). It is the same case in China's tourism development in recent years.…”
mentioning
confidence: 91%
“…As tourism plays an important role in the sociocultural and economic life of many countries (Harrison, 2001;World Tourism Organization, 2002), "tourism education at all levels plays a key role in securing and maintaining sustainable tourism development" (Okumus & Yagci, 2006, p. 90). In this context, several researchers believe that the rapid growth of the tourism industry has led to a chain of consequences regarding both tourism education and tourism research (see Figure 1).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%