Tourism and struggles for domination: Local tourism communities and symbolic violence in Kashmir

Abstract

Community-based tourism development in rural tourist destinations is hindered by the complex interplay of power struggles between the State, hoteliers, travel agents, local tourism players, host community and activists. Following Bourdieu’s ‘epistemologically reflexive’ sociology of everyday life, including his concepts of ‘capital’, ‘habitus’ and ‘field’, I examine the power relations between the Indian State, the regional government, the armed forces, private urban hoteliers and travel agencies, religious corporations, local tourism service providers (e.g. the ponymen and taxi operators) and the host communities operating at the tourism destination of Pahalgam in the Himalayan territory of the Indian-administered Kashmir. Drawing on ethnographic material collected during June–September 2017 and October 2018, I analyse the power relations in the context of a growing political conflict in the region. The central question this article addresses is how and to what extent these actors, particularly the Indian State, engage in contestations for dominance, insurrection and subversion over Pahalgam tourist destination. Theorising the embodiment of ponywālā1 habitus, I demonstrate that ‘subaltern’ dispositions of the ponymen and their corresponding tourism practices of offering pony rides to tourists and pilgrims create boundaries within the destination ‘field’ of Pahalgam. Subsequently, I aim to show that such dispositions cultivate internalised beliefs or doxa among local community players, thus limiting their access to capitals (economic, social, cultural and symbolic) and ensuring the (re)production of their dominated position in the destination field of Pahalgam.

Emerging from the shadows of the COVID-19 pandemic and building back better: Tourist Studies and Asian critical tourism scholarship

“…Articles consider the ways in which Chinese volunteer tourists interpret their experiences (Yu and Na, 2022), how Chinese package tours have persisted but also have changed in relevancy (Ren, 2022), what democracy protest tourism looks like in Hong Kong (Shim et al, 2022) and how tourism has shaped the quality of life for different social groups in Macao (Choe et al, 2021). The issue of power, conflict and violence in Asian tourism has been examined (Ahmad, 2022; Guo and Jordan, 2022; Shim et al, 2022; Wight and Victoria, 2022) as well as the strong role of social media in China tourism (Connell et al, 2021).…”

Creative Tourism Consumption: Framing the Creative Habitus through a Bourdieusian Lens

“…This new cultural mediation gains special relevance when analysed from a Bourdieusian framework. The work of sociologist Pierre Bourdieu has been seldom applied to tourism research, mainly by using only part of his sociological apparatus [29][30][31]. Departing from the traditional concept of habitus, capital and field [32][33][34][35][36], the authors present in this paper an up-to-date version of the main thinking tools of Bourdieu (Table 1), incorporating the theoretical underpinnings of creative tourism [14,31].…”

Power, community involvement, and sustainability of tourism destinations

“…Tourism scholars frequently found a power imbalance between the local community and other stakeholders (Ahmad, 2022; Cornelisse, 2020; Nunkoo, 2017; Nunkoo and Smith, 2015). The community has been found to have the least involvement in tourism policy- and decision-making processes in many destinations (Bornhorst et al, 2010; Farmaki, 2015; Partanen and Sarkki, 2021).…”