1996
DOI: 10.1016/0160-7383(96)00003-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tourism experiences within an attributional framework

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

2
45
0
4

Year Published

2005
2005
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(53 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
2
45
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Following each interview, respondents were asked to provide contact information for up to five individuals who they felt would be interested in participating in this study. The advantages of using this technique include penetration into a random population which may be difficult to access, avoidance of experimenter selection bias, and experimental ease of collecting data (Jackson, White, & Schmierer, 1996).…”
Section: Data Source and Research Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Following each interview, respondents were asked to provide contact information for up to five individuals who they felt would be interested in participating in this study. The advantages of using this technique include penetration into a random population which may be difficult to access, avoidance of experimenter selection bias, and experimental ease of collecting data (Jackson, White, & Schmierer, 1996).…”
Section: Data Source and Research Instrumentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An example of this is found in the work of Jackson et al (1996), who used the critical incident technique in which tourists were asked to recount their most positive and most negative tourism experiences. These qualitative data were reduced using attribution theory.…”
Section: An Informal Taxonomy Of Consumer/tourist Experience Researchmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Respondents were asked to provide contact information for up to five graduates whom they felt would be willing to share their experiences. Snowball sampling has the advantage of penetrating populations that are difficult to access and of avoiding experimenter selection bias (Jackson, White & Schmierer, 1996). The in-depth interviews lasted approximately 30 minutes and were conducted in an environment which was conducive for reflection and which was a private space that would provide respondents with an assurance about confidentiality.…”
Section: Study Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%