2004
DOI: 10.1016/s0261-5177(03)00063-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Tourism routes as a tool for the economic development of rural areas—vibrant hope or impossible dream?

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

6
311
1
31

Year Published

2006
2006
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
3

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 599 publications
(349 citation statements)
references
References 17 publications
6
311
1
31
Order By: Relevance
“…Union (BRIEDENHANN and WICKENS, 2004;FLEISCHER and FELSENSTEIN, 2000;HEGARTY and PRZEZBORSKA, 2005). As a result, over the period [1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999], the EU Structural Funds contributed EUR 7.3 billion to tourism projects (ROBERTS and HALL, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Union (BRIEDENHANN and WICKENS, 2004;FLEISCHER and FELSENSTEIN, 2000;HEGARTY and PRZEZBORSKA, 2005). As a result, over the period [1994][1995][1996][1997][1998][1999], the EU Structural Funds contributed EUR 7.3 billion to tourism projects (ROBERTS and HALL, 2001).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Working together, these stakeholders have developed additional events along the route to extend the wine tourism season. Similarly, Briedenhann and Wickens (2004); Rogerson (2007); Meyer (2004) and Koscak, Colaric-Jakse, and Veljkovic (2014) discuss the potential of routes for promoting regional co-operation and economic development. Each are optimistic about the positive benefits that trails can bring but emphasise the need for strong planning and marketing approaches plus community involvement if these are to be realised (Marschall, 2012).…”
Section: Network and Community Benefitsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…14 expose the problematic nature of such claims by elaborating on Goldworthy's 15 critique of development theories and by highlighting that the theoretical link between tourism and development simply may not be consistent with the reality on the ground. 16 Scholars of the Middle East have contributed to the debate by examining the connection between authoritarian resilience and tourism, noting that the transformation of the sector after privatisation and neo-liberal reforms during the 1990s has strengthened authoritarianism, with the ruler's circles benefitting from economic reforms. In the case of Egypt, Richter and Steiner highlighted how revenues originating from tourism were not shared with the wider public but distributed among the members of closed 'networks of privilege.'…”
Section: Tourism and Politics In Tunisiamentioning
confidence: 99%